Showing posts with label John Carpenter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Carpenter. Show all posts

Friday, October 17, 2008

Requiem for Laurie Strode

H20 1

Truth be told Halloween H20: 20 Years Later shouldn’t have been any kind of success. Placed after three mind numbingly dreadful sequels, not to mention automatically falling right in the shadow of the masterful original, H20 had a lot going against it ten years ago when production wrapped and the film prepared for release. Placing the odds further against the film were constant rewrites, persistent technical difficulties and numerous interferences from a studio looking to turn it into another Scream rather than a proper film to fit into the Halloween legacy.

H20 2

Honestly one can see all of the negative influences weighing on the film during its short running time. H20 is a messy production with many visible mistakes ranging from such obvious flubs like the odd switching of Michael Myer’s mask, to a rather large number of smaller continuity errors. Despite these errors and all that it had going against it, H20 is a surprisingly successful and enduring film that maintains as much if not more of the spirit of Carpenter’s original work than any of the other sequels or the countless number of copycat films that landed in its wake.

H20 3

The reasons for H20’s success are easy to point out. First and foremost is the Steve Miner as the choice of director. Miner’s an undervalued character in the film community and he was the ideal choice to lead H2O back to the spirit of the original. Second is the return of Jamie Lee Curtis to the role of Laurie Strode, her most interesting and iconic character. Thirdly is the cast gathered surrounding Curtis, an engaging and talented group who elevate the film above the many studio caused errors. Finally, and perhaps its biggest asset, is that H20 loves being a Halloween film. Unlike the sequels which felt like they were working against the original as much as they could, H20 works towards Carpenter’s work and it shows as it is the scariest and most resonating of all the Michael Myers sequels.

H20 5

The genesis of H20 came from Curtis herself, who reportedly wanted to do something special for the twentieth anniversary of Carpenter’s film. She also had been itching to revisit the character of Laurie Strode and, like many, had been unhappy with the way the sequels had been handled. Carpenter was approached but balked at the idea of directing although he gave his thumbs up to Curtis to proceed.
An early draft of the script was submitted by Scream scribe Kevin Williamson but it felt too much like a sequel to Scream rather than Halloween. Unfortunately some of Williamson’s material and dialogue survives and at its weakest moments, H20 is a bit too winking and self referential for its own good. Thankfully it does contain Scream’s glowing reverence to Carpenter’s original film and some of its most effective scenes come as it is deliberately paying homage to some of Halloween’s smaller and most enduring moments, such as Laurie staring out of her classroom window (mirrored wonderfully by Michelle Williams here).

H20 6

The script for H20 apparently went through a lot of hands before Robert Zappia and Matt Greenberg ended up sharing the main credit. Despite the many phases it went through, the script for H20 still feels a little undercooked to my tastes. At times the film survives just on the skill of Miner’s direction and talented cast…even when they really don’t have a lot to work with story wise.

H20 8

The set up of H20 is fairly simple. Ignoring parts 3, 4, 5 and 6, H20 is essentially a sequel to the first two films where we find a paranoid, pill popping and alcoholic Laurie Strode living under an assumed name as the head of a private school for teenagers, which includes her son John (played well by a young Josh Hartnett). The film plays out exactly as you expect it to, with Michael Myers finding Laurie and returning to enact another night of mayhem on the kids remaining at the school Halloween night after everyone else has gone on a field trip.
H20 doesn’t attempt to reinvent the wheel here. Miner knows the Slasher film basics and he delights in playing to them…this is after all the man who helmed both Friday the 13th Part Two and Part Three.

H20 11

Born in Connecticut in the early fifties, Miner began cutting his teeth in film in his early twenties with friends Wes Craven and Sean Cunningham. It is indeed Miner who helped produce and edit Craven’s landmark 1972 feature Last House on The Left. He continued working closely with Cunningham throughout the seventies and it was indeed the first sequel to Cunningham’s immeasurably popular Friday The 13th that marked Miner’s first full time directing gig. Working mostly in television with the odd theatrical feature thrown in occasionally (such as 1986’s House and 1999’s Lake Placid) Miner has perhaps not had as distinguished a career as he should have but he remains more than a little undervalued. H20, for all its sloppiness due to the studio’s tampering, remains arguably Miner’s greatest moment.

In front of the camera joining Curtis (who by the way does some of the best work of her career here) as her love interest is award winning actor Adam Arkin, and stealing the film briefly in just a couple of scenes is Curtis mom, Janet Leigh. Watch out for one of the film’s smartest and sweetest references involving Leigh, a car and a certain famous film role she had played herself many years before.

H20 7

Even more worth noting is the younger cast though, one of the best assembled for a horror film in the nineties. Miner had directed Michelle Williams previously on the series that gave her her start, Dawson’s Creek, and she proves a splendid ‘final girl’ here already exhibiting the great acting chops she would eventually hone to devastating effect in her Oscar nominated turn in Brokeback Mountain (2005).
Hartnett, making his debut here, is fine and very believable as Curtis’ frustrated and concerned son. Re-watching the film today, one wonders why Hartnett traded in much of his natural youthful expressiveness for the rather stolid style he has become so known for.

H20 9

Featured in smaller roles are L.L Cool j (in the film’s most underwritten part), Adam Hann-Byrd (7 years after his extraordinary debut in Jodie Foster’s miraculous Little Man Tate (1991), Joseph Gordon-Levitt (whose work since has been quite miraculous in itself) and gorgeous Jodi Lyn O’Keefe (essentially playing the PJ Soles role here, and redeeming herself quite nicely). O’Keefe should also be given kudos for performing the film’s most brutal and grueling sequence that ends with the film’s most classic kill and shock piece.

H20 10

While the film is filled with as many ‘inside tributes’ as possible to the original film (and Halloween II which H20 clearly embraces as well, even though Miner denies it), Miner’s film stands as its own work and if it didn’t have the impact of Craven’s Scream when it was released it definitely distinguished itself amongst the onslaught of that film’s copycats…it also made more people jump than any of those films, something I can attest to after seeing it with a sold out crowd opening night.

H20 13

Far from perfect, Carpenter’s original score is particularly missed although composer John Ottman does the best he can and cleverly weaves Carpenter’s iconic theme in quite well, H20 finally works as a standalone Slasher film and a celebration of the most legendary entry in the genre.

H20 14

H20 did fairly well when it opened (despite Dimension botching the release) and got some surprising critical support from publications like The New Yorker. However a superior work print leaked soon after its release alerting fans that the film had been tampered with, and that many of the film’s issues were not Miner’s fault. Dimension, which had wanted a new Scream and not a new Halloween all along, continued to do the film no favors when it botched its DVD release by not delivering a promised audio commentary by Curtis and Miner, and by over-pricing the near bare bones disc. H20 has still yet to get the proper DVD release it deserves.

H20 15

Battling my nostalgia for Halloween II, H20 is my favorite of the Halloween sequels. Despite the fact that it is a classic example as to the kind of trouble a film can get into due to studio pressure and tampering, H20 is surprisingly potent. One wonders what Miner and Curtis could have accomplished though had they been left alone to really deliver the film they wanted to.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

I Love the Seventies Halloween Clip

Not exactly probing but if you have ever wanted to see clips of Halloween set to to The Talking Heads "Psycho Killer" or hear Luis Guzman and Lisa Marie Presley pontificating on its greatness...here you go:

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Mark Kermode Interviewing John Carpenter on Halloween

Just came across this interview Mark Kermode did with John Carpenter 10 years ago for Halloween's twentieth and wanted to post it for those who haven't seen it.





Sunday, October 12, 2008

John Carpenter Film Poll Results

thing

John Carpenter's The Thing (isn't it hard to believe that this masterpiece was originally considered a failure by many?) reigned supreme in last weeks poll based on Carpenter's work for 76-86. Thanks to everyone who made it one of the most popular polls I have ever hosted here. The results are really interesting and I appreciate all that voted.

Here are the results:


Assault on Precinct 13: 40 (41%)

Halloween: 61 (62%)

Someone's Watching Me: 5 (5%)

Elvis: 17 (17%)

The Fog: 40 (41%)

Escape From New York: 55 (56%)

The Thing: 71 (73%)

Christine: 22 (22%)

Starman: 24 (24%)

Big Trouble in Little China: 32 (32%)

I'm still trying to figure out the details for the next poll, in the meantime please visit this essential The Thing tribute site.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Halloween Film Poll #2: John Carpenter 76-86 (Ten Awe-Inspiring Years)

Carpenter's Halloween 7

One of the most remarkable periods for any American filmmaker comes for director John Carpenter between 1976 and 1986. With no disrespect meant for Carpenter's work before the period or since, this particular ten year run is truly awe inspiring and it is the focus of my 2nd poll here at Moon in the Gutter to celebrate the 30th anniversary of one of Carpenter's most startling creations, Halloween. So vote for as many favorites as you like and ignore the ones you don't and I will post the results a week from now.

Halloween Film Poll #1 Results: The Sequels

Thanks to the folks who participated in last week’s Film Poll on the Halloween sequels. I expected Halloween II to win fairly easily but it got some welcome competition from both Season of the Witch as well as H2O. Thanks again to all that voted and the results are as follows:

Halloween 2 37 votes (71%)

Halloween 3: Season of the Witch 27 votes (51%)

Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers 8 votes (15%)

Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers 5 votes (9%)

Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers 8 votes (15%)

H20 22 votes (41%)

Halloween Resurrection 5 votes (9%)


I will be offering up a new Halloween related poll shortly and hope everyone will participate.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Halloween Tribute Poll #1: The Sequels



All through October, to go along with my sporadic Halloween Tribute posts, I will be conducting some polls for people to participate in. The first one has just gone active and it will hopefully prove interesting as there seems to be a lot of disagreement among fans about what the best and worst of the sequels are to John Carpenter's original. So cast some votes for your favorites and ignore the ones you hate if you decide to vote. I will post the results next Sunday when I start the second of at least four polls. Enjoy...

Friday, September 26, 2008

Starting Next Week at Moon in the Gutter: A Month Long Celebration of The Night He Came Home

Halloween BHS 2

This October marks the 30th anniversary of John Carpenter's incredibly influential Halloween, and I couldn't let the celebration go by without something special, so starting next week at Moon in the Gutter I will be offering up some sporadic visual and written tributes to the film which will stretch throughout my favorite month of the year. Throughout October you'll learn about:

Halloween BHS 3

My special regional connection to the film and why it still means so much to me all these years later.

My nostalgic feelings for the very flawed Halloween 2 and especially the television version of it.

Why I think Laurie Strode is one for the key female characters in all of modern American cinema.

How the seventies couldn't have happened without P.J. Soles.

My hatred for Parts 4, 5 and 6 and my admiration for H2O.

Halloween BHS 4

Plus the usual number of screenshots, wallpapers, some Halloween related polls, and perhaps some surprises as well. I realize Halloween has been covered to death but I will try to bring a personal touch to a film that has haunted my memories for most of my life.

Halloween BHS 1

The usual posts will continue here as well (and also at Fascination and Nostalgia Kinky) but I hope everyone will get a kick out of my upcoming special tribute to one of the greatest of all American films.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Halloween Anniversary Edition

Honestly I have everything in this box except for the Blu-Ray version and the mask so I won't be shelling out the money for this set, but for those interested here is the press release from DVD Active.
I'm actually pretty disappointed as I was hoping Anchor Bay would pull out something really special for Halloween's 30th anniversary but this is basically just a repackaging of what is already out there. I am glad to see the Extended version coming back in print for collectors, even though it is totally inferior to the original but otherwise this is a pretty unimaginative collection.
There are lots of goodies Anchor Bay could have come up with for this release as we have still yet to have a cast commentary (or a track for the many filmmakers influenced by the film) and the rumored outtakes that were discovered a couple of years back have to still yet to resurface. It's really too bad as Carpenter's masterpiece deserves more than this...

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Far Out Films Of The Seventies: The Eyes Of Laura Mars


Starting out life as an early story from legendary director John Carpenter entitled Eyes, Irvin Kershner’s Eyes Of Laura Mars remains one of the slickest and most effective American thrillers of the late seventies. Bolstered by an intense lead performance by Faye Dunaway and some very memorable photography by Helmut Newton, Eyes Of Laura Mars was a fairly big hit back in 1978 but is often overlooked as one of the more memorable films of the period.
Carpenter had come up with the idea for Eyes, about a controversial fashion photographer who can psychically see through the eyes of killer while he is murdering her friends and coworkers, when he was working on spec scripts in the early and mid seventies. After the mammoth success of Halloween, producer Jon Peters bought Carpenter’s story for Columbia Pictures and brought the famed director on board to work on his first major studio film...as its screenwriter.
Carpenter did indeed delver a version of Eyes Of Laura Mars but Columbia wasn’t totally compelled by it so they brought in David Zelag Goodman in to touch it up. The Academy award nominated Goodman is best known for his work on Sam Peckinpah’s Straw Dogs (1971) and the Sci-fi classic Logan’s Run (1976) and his work on Eyes Of Laura Mars remains a point of contention among fans of the film.
Peter’s and Columbia had originally envisioned Eyes as a vehicle for mega-star Barbra Streisand who was fresh off fan favorite A Star Is Born (1976). That idea fell through, although Streisand would end up playing a rather pivotal role in Eyes Of Laura Mars, and Faye Dunaway was hired on instead.

Dunaway, at the time, was rightly considered one of the greatest actresses in Hollywood. She had just had the one-two knock out punch of Roman Polanski’s Chinatown (175) and Sidney Lumet’s Network (1976) and had in fact just won the Academay award for the latter production. Dunaway, nearing forty when she made Eyes Of Laura Mars, was at her absolute height and as Mars she gives one of her great performances, even though it too has its critics.
Future Empire Strikes Back (1980) director Irvin Kershner is often undervalued and Eyes Of Laura Mars is definitely one of his more notable achievements. Kershner got his start in the fifties with such big screen productions like Stakeout On Dope Street (1958) and several popular television productions. This alternating between TV and film would continue throughout the sixties for Kershner where along the way he would garner a few Emmy nominations for his work on the small screen.
Kershner’s most popular film work leading up to Eyes Of Laura Mars were several off the wall dark comedies including A Fine Madness (1966), The Flim-Flam Man (1967) and Up The Sandbox (1972). Sandbox would star Streisand herself in one of her wackiest roles which makes the idea of her in Mars even more intriguing. After the terrific S*P*Y*S in 1974 and the Richard Harris vehicle The Return Of A Man Called Horse (1976), Columbia and Peters approached Kershner with the idea of doing Eyes, a film which would turn out to be his first near all out thriller, and he accepted fairly quickly.
Kershner’s work in Eyes Of Laura Mars is one of its biggest assets. Adapt at building a real sense of dread in the film’s more eerie moments, Kershner also lends his excellent comic hand in the film’s lighter and more human points. His work throughout the film lends it a most distinctive air, almost like a glossy big studio American Giallo. It has that same seductive blood soaked feel about it, something very few American thrillers have ever achieved.
Joining Kershner behind the scenes are Cinematographer Victor J. Kemper, who I just recently wrote about in my look at Arthur Hiller’s The Hospital (1972) and designers Gene Callahan (Art) and Robert Gundlach (Production). Gundlach had just come off a heavy duty job as art director on Robert Guillerman’s King Kong remake in 76 and fittingly Eyes Of Laura Mars resembles the second half of that ambitious and undervalued film perhaps more than any other.

Since Eyes Of Laura Mars is a film set in the fashion world a look at the costume design of the film is warrented and famed designer Theoni V. Aldredge definitely comes through big time with Kershner’s film. Everyone in the film is decked out in some of the most memorable outfits of the period with special mention going to the absolute gorgeous and sexy dresses Aldredge gave Dunaway. It’s stirring work from the multiple Tony and Oscar winning designer and it is a shame that the Academy didn’t at least honor her with a nomination for her work on Eyes Of Laura Mars. She did win a well deserved Saturn Award for the film though.
Legendary and controversial photographer Helmut Newton was hired on by Columbia to shoot the pictures of Laura Mars and his work in the film unforgettable, with his violent and sexy fetishistic photos connecting the film even more to the works by Italian maestros like Sergio Martino and especially Dario Argento. Some of the more striking photos do indeed look like they could be stills from some of the more provocative Italian productions from the early seventies. Eyes Of Laura Mars would mark the first, and unfortunately, final time Newton would lend his unmistakable eye to a film, a fact that alone makes Eyes Of Laura Mars and important work.

Moving along at a lightning pace, thanks to the quick cutting styles of Spielberg editor Michael Kahn, and scored expertly by Artie Kane, Eyes Of Laura Mars is at the very least one of the most entertaining American films of the late seventies. It is also one of the most interesting, perhaps even more so today as our culture has become so saturated by the type of violent and sexual images the film is dealing with. One can see the influence of Newton’s photography everywhere now, from advertisements to film to video, and the questions the film raises about why we are so attracted to such images remains a valuable one.
Joining the rather breathtaking Dunaway is future Oscar winner Tommy Lee Jones, who was just on the brink of stardom here. As the police detective Mars falls for, Jones is very sharp, handsome and justifiably intense. One reason the film’s payoff is so good is due to the amount of humanity and natural charisma that Jones brings to the role. Watching it today, it is impossible to think of anyone else in it. Rounding out the supporting cast are several truly gifted character actors, including scene stealer Rene Auberjonois, Brad Dourif and Raul Julia. Auberjonois is particularly good here and gives the film several brief comic interludes that Kershner works into the proceedings seamlessly.
The models themselves are, of course, all quite striking, with special mention going to both Darlanne Fluegel’s Lulu and Lisa Taylor’s Michele. One of the film’s biggest triumphs is that it allows these models to feel like real people. So often films centering in the fashion world are hampered by weak characterizations but both Fluegel and Taylor are given some wonderful scenes to work with here which makes their murder sequence one of the most spellbinding and moving. They would both appear in a 1978 Playboy spread advertising the film which I have unfortunately not seen.
The thing that I like most about Eyes Of Laura Mars, and the thing that I think separates it from most thrillers from the period, is the way it deliberately dismantles itself just past the middle point. It is easy to look upon the rather forced relationship between Dunaway and Jones as just a stab to bring more people into the theater, but by shifting the tone of the film from hard edged thriller to near sappy romance, Kershner is able to brilliantly set up one of the best pay offs in late seventies American cinema. The rather awkward romantic scenes between Dunaway and Jones only make sense and have a resonance about them after the film has ended, which helps the film gain strength in its reviewings. Kershner is a smart filmmaker and, less a commercial ploy, the sudden switch in tone in the film is actually quite clever.
It is that switch that I believe John Carpenter and many critcs don’t like about the film. Carpenter would have made Eyes Of Laura Mars a much more straight ahead and go for the throat thriller but Kershner seems much more interested in manipulating the audience in different ways. I think Carpenter’s film would have been a real winner, but that shouldn’t take away from Kershner’s work.
Another aspect that has divided fans of the film is the themes song by Streisand that plays at the beginning, end, and at various points throughout the film. I happen to adore the song and think it is one of Streisand’s career defining performances. It also happens to fit the film and Laura Mars character perfectly and I frankly can’t imagine the film without it. Still, it remains a sore spot to some who see Eyes Of Laura Mars as nothing but a slick and pandering piece of commercial filmmaking.
Eyes Of Laura Mars opened in the late summer of 1978 and was a sizeable hit. Critical reaction was mixed but the fans ate it up and it grossed three times its budget throughout the late part of the year. It would also do well in Europe, especially in France where Carpenter’s inventive original story and Kershner’s stylish direction caught the eye of several prominent film critics.
Carpenter has all but disowned the film and has been very vocal about his dislike for the final product. Dunaway would have a couple of minor hits in the late seventies before her career was pretty much destroyed after the disastrous reception that greeted 1981’s ill fated Mommie Dearest. Although she still acts to this day, Eyes Of Laura Mars remains her absolute peak as one of the screen’s great performers and beauties.

Kirshner began work on The Empire Strikes Back right after production on Eyes Of Laura Mars wrapped and his work on that film would be just as spectacular and innovative. His career after is unfortunately scatter shot with only the unofficial James Bond picture Never Say Never Again really show flashes of his obvious brilliance again (although some could make a case for his Robocop 2 as well).
Eyes Of Laura Mars is a rare breed of commercial filmmaking. Like the memorable photographs that Mars takes in the film, there is a lot more to it than just an average middle of the road thriller. Drawing on a real palatable aesthetic, Kershner’s film feels as fresh, alive and as sinister as it did thirty years ago. The current DVD of it features a solid commentary from the director, a vintage behind the scenes feature called Visions and the participation of important DVD producer Laurent Bouzereau who rightly puts the film in its place as one of the most under looked classics of late seventies American cinema.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Carrie White Will Always Have My Vote


With all due respect to directors Stanley Kubrick, David Cronenberg, Tobe Hooper, and John Carpenter, no one will ever equal Brian De Palma's take on Stephen King to my eyes.
So I was disappointed that CARRIE didn't win this weeks poll, but seeing THE SHINING at the top of the list was not surprising.
Thanks to everyone who voted in this weeks poll. It was a lot of fun, and the results are most interesting.

STEPHEN KING: BEST FILM ADAPTATION (1976-1986)

1. THE SHINING: 25 Votes
2. CARRIE: 24 Votes
3. THE DEAD ZONE: 20 Votes
4. STAND BY ME: 16 Votes
5. SALEM'S LOT: 15 Votes
6. CHRISTINE: 13 Votes
7. CUJO: 10 Votes
8. CAT'S EYE: 9 Votes
9. MAXIMUM OVERDRIVE: 8 Votes
10. CHILDREN OF THE CORN: 8 Votes
11. FIRESTARTER: 6 Votes
12. SILVER BULLET: 6 Votes

Thanks again to everyone who participated. I will start a new poll either later tonight or in the morning.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Quick Thoughts On The Upcoming Halloween Remake


John Carpenter's HALLOWEEN is one of my all time favorite films and it is one of the key films of my youth. I first saw it in my early teens on VHS and I must have watched it, and its first sequel, over twenty times as a teenager. I also read all of the novelizations and devoured article after article about it in back issues of magazines like Fangoria. I still revisit the film every Halloween and I never grow tired of it, it is a true American classic and one of the major films that marked Horror as my favorite genre.
I have very mixed feelings on the upcoming re-thinking of HALLOWEEN by Rob Zombie. I think it is a mistake and whatever merits it might have, there is no way it will come close to equalling the original. That said, I must admit that I like Zombie very much and I will be seeing the film opening weekend and I hope it plays better than anyone might expect.
I was never a fan of his music and his first film, HOUSE OF 1,000 CORPSES (2003), left me cold but I greatly admired his THE DEVIL'S REJECTS (2005). To me it is one of the few modern exploitation films that comes close to feeling authentic. It is a controversial work that divides horror fans but I honestly believe that THE DEVIL'S REJECTS will someday be regarded as one of the key genre works of this decade.

I also really like Zombie's wife, Sheri Moon and think that she is an incredibly charismatic and talented actress. The main thing I like about both of them is that they seem to really love the genre. I don't feel any winking, pandering or apologizing, just an overwhelming affection for the same horror movies that I loved and admired growing up.
Zombie has stated repeatedly that the original HALLOWEEN had a major impact on him growing up and I believe that his new version is meant as a tribute. When I saw John Carpenter speak several months ago, he spoke highly of Zombie as a person and filmmaker (and very highly of the check he received for the new film).
So, I will be seeing the new HALLOWEEN but I have to admit that I wish it had been directed by a total hack and I could just ignore it. Apparently the studio has already been tampering with Zombie's final cut and I am honestly not expecting a lot. I hope that Zombie follows it up with an original work and doesn't get trapped in a remake mode, as we are overrun with them right now.
HALLOWEEN is one film that I did not want to see get remade. It is one of the most perfect American films of the seventies and I can only hope that Zombie's version isn't an embarrassment. Hopefully it will turn out like Aja's searing HILLS HAVE EYES remake and have something valuable to add rather than being something truly horrendously bad like THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE re-working. Either way, I will be there opening weekend and success or failure, I will still admire Rob and Sheri Moon and hope that they will one day deliver another film as good as THE DEVIL'S REJECTS.
I must say that even if I do end up liking the new HALLOWEEN, nothing and I mean nothing will ever replace these three for me.

Friday, May 11, 2007

John Carpenter Q and A Day Two: Craven, Scar and Morricone


John Carpenter concluded his question and answer session this afternoon and while several of the same topics from yesterday were covered, many interesting new ones were also brought up.
After a nice introduction Carpenter quickly settled into the same relaxed tone as yesterday, only today to an even smaller audience. He talked a bit more about Bowling Green and he credited much of the 'evil' in his films as being directly related to his time here. Specifically he mentioned an evening in Russellville involving a girlfriend and a stepfather that had particularly stuck with him, but he didn't give any details.
Highlights of the first half were a conversation about how the unexpected success of ASSAULT ON PRECINCT THIRTEEN in England really helped set the stage for HALLOWEEN. Carpenter admitted that while THE THING was his favorite film of his own, HALLOWEEN remained his best experience. He credited the youth of almost everyone involved and the excitement of working with Donald Pleasance.
The subject of his actor's came up more today and Carpenter said that he still treasured being able to have worked with his Henry Brandon in ASSAULT, since Brandon had played Scar in THE SEARCHERS (still one of Carpenter's favorite films.) John credited the classic Hollywood directors of his youth, specifically Howard Hawks, Hitchcock and Orson Welles as being his biggest influences. When asked about the easiest to work with Kurt Russell's name immediately came up. James Woods name was mentioned when Carpenter was asked about the most difficult but John quickly added that Woods is a brilliant actor, and it seemed clear that there wasn't any real animosity. He did admit that Courtney Love gave him the biggest headache before being replaced by Natasha Henstridge in GHOSTS OF MARS due to her drug and emotional problems. Love recently sent Carpenter a written apology and he said he hoped she was continuing to do better. GHOSTS OF MARS remains one of Carpenter's most under-appreciated films and I personally love Henstridge in it asnd I can't imagine that Love could have brought the same coolness and presence to the role.
Several questions came up concerning Carpenter's peers including one asking whether he had ever felt any competition, specifically with Wes Craven. He replied no and said that he still kept in touch with Craven who had told recently told him to 'stay away' from the Weinstein group. This led into a talk on Crapenter's distaste for the 'corporate Hollywood' system and how the director as author idea was getting more and more lost.
The subject of music took up a lot of the talk today. GRINDHOUSE was brought up and Carpenter mentioned Rodriguez had wanted him to score it but he had a commitment to the MASTER'S OF HORROR program. He said he hadn't seen GRINDHOUSE but that he liked both Rodriguez and Tarantino (whom he labeled endearingly as an 'incredibly talented fanboy') and he took great interest in our audience's different opinions on GRINDHOUSE. He pointed out that if he hadn't been a director that music would have been his second choice or perhaps even an English teacher.
With the topic of music in the air I asked him about his collaboration with Morricone in THE THING and he still seemed obviously proud of it. He described going to Italy to meet with Ennio, even though Carpenter couldn't speak Italian and Morricone couldn't speak English, and getting bits of music to take back to score THE THING with. He asked me if I liked the score from THE MISSION, a personal favorite of his, and I said of course but I pointed to the Argento scores as some of my own personal favorites. I was surprised to see that Carpenter had forgotten that Morricone had done work with Argento and he asked me to name the films and he seemed particularly pleased to be reminded of them, especially BIRD WITH CRYSTAL PLUMAGE. I wish now I would have asked about Goblin's work in DEEP RED in relationship to Carpenter's score from HALLOWEEN.
A final topic that stood out was a question that brought up Carpenter's canonization in the classroom and his thoughts on it. "Better than getting my ass kicked" was a pretty perfect answer and then he said it was 'very flattering.'
His message to young aspiring filmmakers was a simple but effective one, 'just make sure you HAVE to direct', that 'halfway' wouldn't cut it.
With a final joke of, "I have to go meet my drug dealer" John Carpenter wrapped up this second session to our really small but appreciative crowd. I got to meet him afterwards and he signed my THE FOG soundtrack and was a very warm man to speak to. A friend of mine was lucky enough to get a poster from HALLOWEEN signed that had me very envious, but I am pretty happy with an autographed copy of one of may favorite scores (which I have scanned here.)

John Carpenter is receiving a much deserved honorary doctorate tomorrow from the university. In a career that has now spanned nearly 35 years and highlighted by some of the most influential and creative genre films of the modern era, John Carpenter is a true icon. It was a real pleasure to listen to him speak on these two occasions and to get share a moment and handshake with him. I hope the awards ceremony tomorrow is a memorable one for him.

****POSTSCRIPT**** Here is a photo from WKU's website of John getting his honorary degree. Congratulations, I hope it was a great day for him

Thursday, May 10, 2007

John Carpenter Q and A Day One: Argento, Laura Mars and Elvis


Before I write on John Carpenter's first Question and Answer session that was held this afternoon I need to rant a bit. You would think that a visit from one of the most famous and influential American film directors of the past thirty years would at least get a mention in our school paper or perhaps at the very least some flyer's advertising it, but for whatever reason though this first of two sessions was hardly mentioned at all. It made for a very intimate session with only 50 or so people in attendance but I must say that I feel for the many that would have come had they known about it.
It was a really entertaining, informative and fun hour with one of our most iconic filmmakers. The rather informal talk was made up of mostly answering questions but Carpenter was very open and riffed a lot thankfully, which led him into a lot of far reaching areas from his career.
He described his early days in Bowling Green, Ky and his two years here at Western Kentucky University before going to film school at U.S.C. He credited a showing of FORBIDDEN PLANET at a local Bowling Green theater as the film that really first sparked his interest in cinema. Coincidentally I picked up the new Video Watchdog after seeing him this afternoon and none other than FORBIDDEN PLANET is on the cover.
Speaking warmly of his time at U.S.C and his early work as a Writer's Guild member, Carpenter admitted that the most important things to keep with you were 'drive and dreams.' He then went on to say that among the best modern day film studies for younger people were dvd audio commentaries and documentaries. He advised the crowd to listen to as many commentaries as possible and watch as many films as they could.
Carpenter through all of it was extremely laid back and low key and talked about how much he loved to 'fuck off' and 'smoke a joint' in preparing for a film, in which he described the long and grueling hours of directing as being like a 'coal miner'. He admitted that he was tired and didn't have the same push that he had when he was younger.
He spoke of his early career and the disappointment over the film version of his EYES OF LAURA MARS script and the difficulties in editing a particular scene in ASSAULT ON PRECINCT THIRTEEN. When asked about different roles he admitted writing was the easiest, composing the hardest and directing the most fun.
The talk turned especially interesting when someone in the audience criticised his recent PRO LIFE episode from MASTERS OF HORROR. Carpenter admitted that he preferred it over CIGARETTE BURNS and I thought it was a little harsh to criticize something in front of him that he had just recently worked on. The mood continued to change as another audience member questioned the overt use of gore in modern horror films like HOSTEL (apparently this guy hasn't seen too many Italian films from the seventies or even Carpenter's own GHOSTS OF MARS). Carpenter was quick to defend Eli Roth and his film and pointed out that horror filmmakers often were representing the current climate and culture in their films. Throughout the talk Carpenter was very supportive of the younger crop of filmmakers, although he admitted that many were 'shooters as opposed to directors' and said that it was important to know past films but to not be afraid to branch out with ideas that might go against them.
Carpenter then talked at length about the modern studio system and how overwhelmingly corporate it was. He mentioned admiring Sam Raimi but seemed baffled by SPIDERMAN THREE's 250 million dollar budget. A question about current directors had him saying that he loved Paul Thomas Anderson, admired Scorsese but grudgingly said that everyone regarded Spielberg as still the 'most powerful'.
The inevitable topic of remakes came up and Carpenter made it clear that his only involvement in them was getting a check. I found his attitude on the matter to be refreshingly honest. Of course one wishes that they weren't happening but it does all come down to money and Carpenter was very open about it. He did go out of his way to say that he liked Rob Zombie very much and he did give him one piece of advice and that was, 'to do his own thing with it.' He said he hadn't seen the trailer for new HALLOWEEN and he honestly he didn't seem that interested. No mention was made of the upcoming ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK or the more recent FOG or ASSAULT ON PRECINCT THIRTEEN remakes.
I did get a couple of questions in. I asked about the status of ELVIS and he said it was his understanding that they were 'working on it' but he admitted he had turned down an audio commentary due to it's length. I told him how much I loved STARMAN and he really perked up at its mention saying how much he also loved the film and the cast, especially Jeff Bridges.

Upon my mentioning of Dario Argento a couple of audience members actually smirked but Carpenter quickly cut them off by saying, "I love Dario, I love and admire his films. He's not afraid to hit it hard." I must say that they didn't smirk after that and I felt a rush of vindication. It was great to hear Carpenter say that about Argento, whose early giallos and DEEP RED did so much to influence HALLOWEEN.
Other brief topics included Carpenter's love of Morricone and how proud he was of his own son's composing skills.


It was a really incredible experience seeing this man in person whose films have meant so much to me since I was a child. If all goes according to plan I will see him speak again tomorrow and will share some thoughts on that as well.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

John Carpenter Back In Western Kentucky


Over the weekend I received the exciting news from my film professor that John Carpenter is going to be visiting my school Friday to receive an honorary degree and will be meeting with students for a Q and A session. I must say the prospect of meeting Carpenter has me very excited and is ending an otherwise stressful semester on a very high note.
Carpenter and his his films are major favorites of mine and I can't imagine having grown up without HALLOWEEN, THE FOG, THE THING and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK (The first rated R movie I ever saw in a theater!!)
One plus in being from Kentucky is noticing all of the local references Carpenter has thrown into his films, especially HALLOWEEN. It has always made me feel a little more a part of his films; my mom sharing a class with him in the sixties didn't hurt either.
I'll be posting a report on his talk and my reactions to it this weekend. I will try to compose myself and not blurt out about wanting to hear stories concerning Jamie Lee Curtis and P.J. Soles. I am trying to think of questions for him that wouldn't be too obvious. With the recent tragic death of Bob Clark I though I might ask about the influence BLACK CHRISTMAS had on HALLOWEEN and what the hold up is on his 1978 tv film ELVIS on dvd.
Anyway, I am very excited about getting to see the man in person and hope to have some good stories to share about it.