One of my favorite director's most groundbreaking films is finally set to get a decent home video release, courtesy of the excellent Cult Epics, this Tuesday. Radley Metzger's glorious and trailblazing canon has been represented on Region 1 DVD in the past with mostly washed out, and sometimes cut, prints so Cult Epics restored print of his Score is a real welcome release. Cult Epics is releasing a couple of different versions of the film, and some really wonderful extras are included such as a commentary with Metzger, and I hope that this is just the first in a line of Metzger releases they will be putting out.
Recent Posts from my Official Site
Showing posts with label Radley Metzger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Radley Metzger. Show all posts
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Radley Metzger's Score on DVD and Blu-Ray Tuesday
One of my favorite director's most groundbreaking films is finally set to get a decent home video release, courtesy of the excellent Cult Epics, this Tuesday. Radley Metzger's glorious and trailblazing canon has been represented on Region 1 DVD in the past with mostly washed out, and sometimes cut, prints so Cult Epics restored print of his Score is a real welcome release. Cult Epics is releasing a couple of different versions of the film, and some really wonderful extras are included such as a commentary with Metzger, and I hope that this is just the first in a line of Metzger releases they will be putting out.
Radley Metzger's The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann Special Edition

What an amazing time to be a Radley Metzger fan! With new special editions out of Score, The Lickerish Quartet and The Image out on DVD and Blu-Ray it's been one great release after another. Perhaps the most exciting releases though are yet to come with Distribpix gearing up to release Metzger's legendary 'Henry Paris' films completely uncut and loaded with extras. First up is Metzger's 1974 'Paris' shot work The Private Afternoon's of Pamela Mann. Distribpix's edition will be arriving within the upcoming weeks in a double-disc set offering the rare film up completely uncut in a brand-new HD transfer from an original 35 mm print. Extras on the extremely impressive sounding set include a documentary including outtakes, deleted scenes, alternative footage and more! There are also interviews with stars Eric Edwards and Georgina Spelvin plus a full-length commentary track with Metzger himself. Details on all the extras, plus screenshots, can be found at Distribpix's (NSFW) official site and blog. This is truly a magical time for Radley Metzger fans and this DVD of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is a huge and important release.
Radley Metzger's The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann (1974)

Easily one of the most important archival releases of the year, Distribpix's new collection dedicated to Radley Metzger's The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is a powerhouse release and essential purchase for Metzger-fans and cinema-lovers. This new double-disc edition of Metzger's first outing as the legendary Henry Paris offers up the film completely uncut and beautifully remastered. Armed with an arsenal of valuable extras, this new version of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is not only the best edition of this film ever released but one of the best releases of its kind ever.


Frank is a private detective, and self-confessed peeping tom, who is hired on by a Mr. Mann to spy on his wife Pamela, as he suspects she is having an affair. Frank follows and films Pamela as she makes her way through various Manhattan locations and soon finds himslef involved in a life much more complicated and surprising than he would have ever imagined.

Despite being shot on an extremely low-budget in less than a week, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann contains the same sort of depth, polish and style as Radley Metzger's more well-known films from the sixties and seventies such Therese and Isabelle, The Lickerish Quartet and Camille 2000. A wonderfully self-aware work powered by a smart script, witty dialogue, terrific performances and Metzger's considerable skill behind the camera, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann takes all the conventions of a typical adult-film and playfully turns them inside out. As Lawrence Cohen notes in his wonderful analysis in Distribix's near fifty page liner-notes, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is a, "legitimate work of art", and, "one that deserves the loving attention of film connoisseurs." Radley Metzger's first Henry Paris film waves a defiant middle-finger to film fans and historians who insist on ignoring the golden age of adult cinema as a viable art-form, and it is an ideal entryway for newcomers interested in 'The Other Hollywood'.


Film historian Benson Hurst points out in his excellent notes for Distribix's booklet that The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann came about due to a few different factors, with two of the most notable being the financial failure of Metzger's previous film, the excellent Score, and the release of Damiano's Deep Throat in 1972. Hurst notes that, "overnight the landscape for soft-core films changed", and that, "the market for stylish fantasy trips made with intelligence and high production values", like the films Metzger had been making for more than a decade, were gone. Audiences were enjoying the new-found freedom to watch more explicit forms of filmmaking and, though he was hesitant to join in, Radley Metzger took the plunge with The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann and for five years he delivered the most exquisite and smartest adult films American audiences had seen before or since.


The one aspect about Radley Metzger I have always valued the most is just how much this man loves film. The near fetishistic obsession with celluloid is apparent in all of Metzger's best films and this is especially true of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann. Hurst writes that it just took a few minutes of meeting Metzger before the conversation turned to film and he noted that, "Radley balances an encyclopedic knowledge with a humble and genuine interest in other people's opinions." Radley Metzger, now in his seventies, remains a man fascinated by all things cinematic and this obsession is reflected in many of his most memorable characters, several of which can be found in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann.





It might be a surprise to those who just know his reputation as an erotic auteur, but the two most repeated images in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann don't concern sex. Going along with Radley Metzger's love for cinema, the two things we see the most of throughout the film are a camera and projector. Like in his earlier masterwork The Lickerish Quartet, the characters in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann spend much of the running time watching and studying film, and we, as an audience, are treated to numerous shots of the camera, the inner-workings of the projector and even the film itself. Metzger's first Paris production is a strikingly post-modern work that is so confident in its self-awareness that it doesn't miss an opportuinity to comment on it. Make no mistake though, while it certainly has elements of satire in it, this isn't a parody of an adult-film. It is in actuality an embrace of the genre and what it is capable of. It is also a slap in the face to the conservative groups looking to ban these films and prosecute those involved with the film's most biting moment being a line delivered by Metzger's editor Lola Lagarce, who shows up as a poll-taker throughout the film asking Pamela about heated issues of the day. I won't give away the film's most explosive and funniest moment but I will say that it is perhaps the most jaw-dropping line in all of Metzger's filmography.








It is fitting that such a high quality film as The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann be graced with an extraordinary cast and it certainly is. As the title character striking looking Barbara Bourbon is quite wonderful. Sexy, warm and witty, Bourbon really shines as Pamala Mann and its a shame she only appeared in a handful of films before retiring. Distribpix's booklet features an enlightening new interview with her that will be of great interest to those who ever wondered what happened to one of adult-cinema's greatest disappearing acts. The rest of the cast is made up of some of New York's finest including the uber-talented Eric Edwards and Jamie Gillis (whose sporting a head of hair here that I would kill for) and the iconic Georgina Spelvin, who delivers a very funny and inventive performance as Pamela's friend Linda (her Rhoda to Bourbon's Mary if you will). Also on hand in smaller roles are Sonny Landham, Darby Lloyd Rains, Marc Stevens (excluding a goofy charm), Alan Marlow, Levi Richards and gorgeous Naomi Jason (billed as Day Jason). Naomi, who would appear in the terrific The Passions of Carol in 1976, is a real scene-stealer here as a receptionist dealing with a very particular form of office-harassment.




Shot on 16mm, by furure Oscar winner Paul Glickman (as Marcel Hall), The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann, like so many other of these films made during this period, offers up a wonderful view of New York City in the mid-seventies. With its numerous street-shots, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann acts as much of a valentine to the city as say a Woody Allen film from the period. For folks, like myself, who have fond memories of the city Metzger's film will be a real eye-opening experience as New York is presented so lovingly and so incredibly well.







While the release of the uncut version of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann would make Distribpix's new collection a must-buy the Criterion style treatment the film has received as far as extras go make it truly indespinsable. Disc-one offers up a fascinating commentray track from Metzger himself, as well as the original theatrical trailer, a stills gallery and an excellent near 40 minute interview with Eric Edwards. The exhaustive extras continue on disc 2 in the shape of a truly special near 40 minute chat with Georgina Spelvin (such a charmer), a 2011 re-release trailer, outtakes, stills, press-clippings, a then and now look at the locations and a never before seen alternate version of the film prepared for, but not released in, 1976. Add on the impressive almost fifty page booklet and a glossy still of Bourbon and you have one of the most comprehensive and worth-while DVD collections releases of this or any other year.




More information on The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann can be found at Distribpix's official site, order-site (NSFW) and blog. It is one of the essential collections in recent memory and Distrippix's dedication to a film most would be content to ignore is both noble and noteworthy. It is Distribpix's second Radley Metzger release (with the first being the double-disc set of Maraschino Cherry) and the rest of the Henry Paris films are in the works for future release.
...
Saturday, June 27, 2026
A Moon in the Gutter Q&A with adult film historian Michael J. Bowen
Today I am really thrilled to present this Q&A I conducted via email with noted adult film historian Michael J. Bowen. Readers here, who might recall some of my posts on the films of Joe Sarno, will know how much I admire Michael and value his work, so this was a real pleasure to do. Michael talks about his background, his work with Sarno and Doris Wishman, as well as his other projects and interests. Enough of my rambling...let's here from the man himself:

Michael with actor Tod Moore ("Judson Todd") and Peggy Steffans-Sarno at the recent Anthology Film Archives tribute to Joe Sarno.
Michael, Thank you very much for taking the time to do this. I greatly admire your work and I am thrilled to have you as part of this series. To start with, can you tell us a bit about yourself, your background and your work as a film historian?
I started out as kind of a film buff, I guess, as a kid growing up in the Boston area. I worked for a period of time as the assistant manager at a repertory theater and was just always interested in cinema from an aesthetic point of view, going to repertory and art theaters all the time. Like many people, I first came across sexploitation movies on videotape in the 1990s and was fascinated to realize that there had been this whole, dynamic, commercial cinema that had basically fallen entirely below the radar of traditional film connoisseurship. I also realized that a certain cadre of filmmakers working within this genre were exceptional “outsider” talents, and so I began to look more closely into the films and into their production context. In the early 2000’s, I also decided to apply to the PhD program in Cinema Studies at NYU as a means of formalizing my studies and have used it as a base of operation for my expanding research on independent commercial cinema in New York in the 1960s and ‘70s. I am not, per se, a generic exploitation movie fan – especially horror movies – but I engage with certain films that I feel bear the hallmarks of original, aesthetically interesting filmmaking.
Who were some of the initial filmmakers that got you interested in cinema and what were some of your early favorite films?
I started out as a kid as a fan of bad science fiction movies, mostly seen on “Creature Feature” type re-runs on TV. I used to keep a card file with the credits for every film I saw, laboriously (and probably inaccurately!) copied off the screen as they flashed by (this was well before the days of home video, natch). I think I first encountered genuine masterpieces of world cinema – classic and silent Hollywood and foreign art films – on public television. I was always (and continue to be) a pretty canonical fan of the great post-war European cinema: Fellini and Bergman were early favorites; I’ve become quite addicted to Antonioni, Bresson and Dreyer as I get older. I’m also kind of a sucker for the edgier “indie” classics of my formative years, the 1970s: Scorsese, Nicolas Roeg, David Lynch. That said, I am not exactly a classic auteurist because I’m the first to admit that many of the great filmmakers made some pretty lousy movies during their careers. I guess I was always attracted to films that privileged formal over narrative elements.
I know you the most from your extraordinary work documenting and writing on Joe Sarno but can you tell us about some of your earlier work as a film historian and writer, specifically your work on Doris Wishman?
Historical research is essentially tedious and empirical. The first few times you phone up an old film personality and conduct an interview, it’s kinda fun, but ultimately the real work is 80% document-based. I’m sure I’ve ruined my eyesight reading through thirty years’ worth of Variety and scanning old film ads on microfilm, but that’s were you collect most of your data. In rare instances some of my interview contacts have preserved records that they’ve been kind enough to share with me – always very exciting – but that’s an exception. I’ve often said, documenting the careers of low-budget outsider filmmakers (as opposed to “big names”) is like the difference between eating crabs and eating lobsters – no tail meat! But over time I’ve been able to pull together lots and lots of scraps of information that are gradually beginning to add up to some sort of a “big picture.” In truth, I’m probably more of an archivist than a writer by nature; I enjoy building my dossiers and databases and think of books and articles as just a means for delivering the info. That said, I hope the interpretive aspects of my writing speak in some meaningful way to the films I engage with: that’s where writing really trumps evidence.

As for Doris, I met her at Harvard University (I was attending Brown at the time) in the mid-1990s, where she’d been invited for a modest retrospective of her work. I guess we just hit it off and I realized that somebody, somewhere, ought to make an effort to document her life and career. She certainly could have selected a more product-oriented biographer – I’ve been fiddling around with this project for over a decade now – but I think Doris saw my sincerity and was happy to work with me. I loved her dearly.
How were you first introduced to the cinema of Joe Sarno and how did you first come into contact with him?
I first saw Joe’s films, like many people, on Something Weird videotapes. I was working with Doris at the time, however, and really had no intention of expanding into research on other directors. I initially contacted Joe, in fact, because he had worked with several actors who had also worked with Doris – including, of course, the divine Ms. Cleo Nova, a.k.a. Joe’s wife and production partner, my dear friend Peggy Steffans. The day we met was memorable because it was September 10, 2001, the day before the World Trade Center was attacked. At any rate, I just thought Joe was the most extraordinarily kind and sincere guy - and I fell in love with Peggy right off the bat - so we just sort of became friends. Then I realized that Joe’s career needed to be documented as badly (if not more so) than Doris’s (because it was so much bigger) and began expanding my research and interviews to include information about Joe’s work. So I guess you could say that my installation as Joe’s biographer was kind of an outgrowth of the fact that I liked the guy so much and was always enthused about the prospect of foraging in new fields. Since so many of his films were missing or dispersed or difficult to find at the time I met him, it probably took a couple of years for me to actually get to see the majority of his work.
To my eyes Sarno is one of the key filmmakers of the sixties and seventies. For folks who are just being introduced to his works what film would you recommend as an ideal introduction, and do you have a personal favorite you would like to share with us?
Overall, I’ve always felt that Joe Sarno fans are very self-selected: there’s a certain rhythm to his work that not everybody is able to groove with. My favorites of Joe’s films tend to reflect my own interest in cinematic minimalism, films where Joe simply lets a situation build and is not primarily focused on the mechanics of technique. I usually weed out the Sarnoites from the tourists by suggesting that they watch Vibrations (1968): if that doesn’t strike you as one of the best fucking movies ever made, then you probably aren’t going to get too carried away by the rest of his work. For me, Vibrations is Sarno in crack form... one light, agonizingly tight framing, oodles of repressed desire. Perfect.

Misty poster courtesy of Michael's terrific Sarno Facebook group, Red Roses of Passion.
Among his earlier efforts (and don’t forget that several of his mid-Sixties films are still officially “lost”), I really like The Sex Cycle: it’s so naïve yet so engaging it literally makes me high: it’s like a dream I want to remember forever. And in terms of his later soft-core work, Abigail Lesley and Misty (if you can find a bootleg) are so melancholy and sincere that I feel they ought to be counted among the top 100 films of the 1970s.
Your liner-notes that have graced Sarno’s DVDs are extremely insightful and informative. Do you have plans in the future on perhaps releasing a full-scale biography?
Sometime in the next few years (but please don’t hold me that that!), there will be a major Joe Sarno biography. Joe had an extraordinary career and it has to be accurately documented. I also spent many, many hours interviewing him on audiotape a few years ago, so there are lots of observations he made that I want to get out there.
I know you have had the great fortune to meet and interview many of Sarno’s key collaborators and actors. Is there someone in particular that has proven elusive that you would like to sit down with?
Yes. Her name is Patricia McNair and she starred in many of Joe’s seminal sexploitation classics of the mid-1960s under the name Lorraine or Laurene Claire. She was an extraordinary presence in Joe’s films and someone I have never been able to track down.

Before he passed away you helped Sarno on the extras of his extraordinary Abigail Lesley is Back in Town. I think the film is a masterpiece and the DVD that came out earlier this year became an instant favorite. Along with the incredible commentary and interviews you got to go back to Sarno’s hometown of Amityville with him. Can you talk about this mini-doc a bit as I find it incredibly moving?
Since Joe shot most of Abigail Lesley in and around Amityville, we wanted to go back and find some of the locations he used. We had, in fact, not planned to interview him in the car on the way out there, but I am so grateful that my extraordinary cameraman, Scooter McCrae, thought to start rolling while we talked. Then, of course, we were lucky enough to have had access to the house where Joe grew up since his childhood friend Henry Marcley now lived there – a wonderful guy! So I wish I could say that I had the prescience to plan everything that happened that day, but it just kind of fell together – as it turns out, less than a year before Joe passed away. I’m very glad we got it on tape.
The late Jamie Gillis also was on hand for the film’s extras. What were your impressions of him and did you get the sense that he was happy to have some of his work recognized as important?

Jamie was an extremely sincere, intense, thoughtful guy the few times I met him and he seemed to think the world of Joe as a director. I believe he was very happy to receive recognition for his work as an actor – not just a porn star – during his last few years.
By the late seventies, Sarno was working fairly actively in the adult film industry. How did Sarno feel about his time in that industry and did he have any favorite performers from the era he worked with?
Joe was a director’s director: if he wasn’t making a movie, he didn’t know what to do with himself. So I know he put his heart and soul into making explicit, X-rated films as well. That having been said, he also frequently observed that he felt there were inherent limitations to what one could do with a film with hardcore content, so it wasn’t his favorite way to work. But given the vagaries of the adult film market, he was very grateful to have the chance to stay in production and was proud of every film he made.

In terms of his favorite actors, Joe got along with 99% of his actors famously, so I doubt he privileged one over the other. He was very fond of Tina Russell, Georgie Spelvin (a great lady!), Jennifer Welles, Annie Sprinkle. He and Peggy were very close to Rob Everett (Eric Edwards) and Harry Reems. Joe managed to get the best out of everyone he worked with: the actors trusted him because he was intensely sincere about his work.
One thing I greatly admire about you is your dedication to filmmakers who are so often ignored and sometimes greatly maligned. Have you had a lot of opposition from certain film elitists who don’t see the value in directors you admire and find important?
The “opposition” one encounters to the kind of work I do usually takes the form of silence. And it comes more from academics than from contemporary film critics, most of whom, I have found, have a very soft spot in their hearts for the labors of filmmakers like Joe and Doris. The problem that academic intellectuals have is that most films of this nature do not naturally lend themselves to textualization: in other words, most interesting “outsider” filmmaking lacks a certain self-consciousness, an explicit aesthetic agenda, that most intellectuals look for and try to translate textually into articles, etc. So the silence of the films tends to inspire silence in the scholars – and believe me, if anybody abhors silence, it’s academics! So I guess I see myself as a little bit of a fish out of water in this respect, but it has always been a reflex of mine to respond to naiveté and spontaneity in art. Most intellectuals want art-makers to be intellectuals too. I don’t.
Do you have any future career plans you would like to share with us?
Outside of attempting to complete all of the above (gasp! moan!), I would very much like to bring more attention to great, French “outsider” filmmakers like Jean Rollin and Jose Benazeraf – tremendous talents whose work has not always been valued by their own countrymen. It would be nice to help arrange decent retrospectives of their films in the U.S. And I have a few side projects lingering as well: a book on actor/director Neil Flanagan composed in the vein of Rudolph Grey’s Ed Wood biography, Nightmare of Ecstasy; and a substantial essay on the dubbing industry in New York during the 1960s and ‘70s, a fascinating and important element of the cultural history of foreign film reception in America. I have also been assisting porn auteur Carter Stevens pull together a memoir about his own extraordinary career for quite a while: he’s a wonderful guy and I’m sorry I have not been able to focus on it more exclusively. My biggest problem, obviously, is that I never run out of subjects that interest me! One day it will all get done.
Cult Epics first (of what I hope will be many) Radley Metzger DVDs, a special edition of Score, has recently come out and Michael's fine work can be found on that disc's supplements. I also wanted to mention that Michael has been working tirelessly in the last few years uploading thousands of additions and corrections to the IMDB's listings for the adult films of the sixties and seventies. He has also uploaded hundreds of accurate release dates (you can usually tell his as he includes the city in which the premiere occurred) for these films that he has verified through his exhaustive research.
Thanks again to Michael for agreeing to do this and I hope it will lead some folks here to seek out some of the films mentioned above. Also, please take a moment and join the Red Roses of Passion Facebook page as Michael and I would greatly appreciate it.

Michael with actor Tod Moore ("Judson Todd") and Peggy Steffans-Sarno at the recent Anthology Film Archives tribute to Joe Sarno.
Michael, Thank you very much for taking the time to do this. I greatly admire your work and I am thrilled to have you as part of this series. To start with, can you tell us a bit about yourself, your background and your work as a film historian?
I started out as kind of a film buff, I guess, as a kid growing up in the Boston area. I worked for a period of time as the assistant manager at a repertory theater and was just always interested in cinema from an aesthetic point of view, going to repertory and art theaters all the time. Like many people, I first came across sexploitation movies on videotape in the 1990s and was fascinated to realize that there had been this whole, dynamic, commercial cinema that had basically fallen entirely below the radar of traditional film connoisseurship. I also realized that a certain cadre of filmmakers working within this genre were exceptional “outsider” talents, and so I began to look more closely into the films and into their production context. In the early 2000’s, I also decided to apply to the PhD program in Cinema Studies at NYU as a means of formalizing my studies and have used it as a base of operation for my expanding research on independent commercial cinema in New York in the 1960s and ‘70s. I am not, per se, a generic exploitation movie fan – especially horror movies – but I engage with certain films that I feel bear the hallmarks of original, aesthetically interesting filmmaking.
Who were some of the initial filmmakers that got you interested in cinema and what were some of your early favorite films?
I started out as a kid as a fan of bad science fiction movies, mostly seen on “Creature Feature” type re-runs on TV. I used to keep a card file with the credits for every film I saw, laboriously (and probably inaccurately!) copied off the screen as they flashed by (this was well before the days of home video, natch). I think I first encountered genuine masterpieces of world cinema – classic and silent Hollywood and foreign art films – on public television. I was always (and continue to be) a pretty canonical fan of the great post-war European cinema: Fellini and Bergman were early favorites; I’ve become quite addicted to Antonioni, Bresson and Dreyer as I get older. I’m also kind of a sucker for the edgier “indie” classics of my formative years, the 1970s: Scorsese, Nicolas Roeg, David Lynch. That said, I am not exactly a classic auteurist because I’m the first to admit that many of the great filmmakers made some pretty lousy movies during their careers. I guess I was always attracted to films that privileged formal over narrative elements.
I know you the most from your extraordinary work documenting and writing on Joe Sarno but can you tell us about some of your earlier work as a film historian and writer, specifically your work on Doris Wishman?
Historical research is essentially tedious and empirical. The first few times you phone up an old film personality and conduct an interview, it’s kinda fun, but ultimately the real work is 80% document-based. I’m sure I’ve ruined my eyesight reading through thirty years’ worth of Variety and scanning old film ads on microfilm, but that’s were you collect most of your data. In rare instances some of my interview contacts have preserved records that they’ve been kind enough to share with me – always very exciting – but that’s an exception. I’ve often said, documenting the careers of low-budget outsider filmmakers (as opposed to “big names”) is like the difference between eating crabs and eating lobsters – no tail meat! But over time I’ve been able to pull together lots and lots of scraps of information that are gradually beginning to add up to some sort of a “big picture.” In truth, I’m probably more of an archivist than a writer by nature; I enjoy building my dossiers and databases and think of books and articles as just a means for delivering the info. That said, I hope the interpretive aspects of my writing speak in some meaningful way to the films I engage with: that’s where writing really trumps evidence.
As for Doris, I met her at Harvard University (I was attending Brown at the time) in the mid-1990s, where she’d been invited for a modest retrospective of her work. I guess we just hit it off and I realized that somebody, somewhere, ought to make an effort to document her life and career. She certainly could have selected a more product-oriented biographer – I’ve been fiddling around with this project for over a decade now – but I think Doris saw my sincerity and was happy to work with me. I loved her dearly.
How were you first introduced to the cinema of Joe Sarno and how did you first come into contact with him?
I first saw Joe’s films, like many people, on Something Weird videotapes. I was working with Doris at the time, however, and really had no intention of expanding into research on other directors. I initially contacted Joe, in fact, because he had worked with several actors who had also worked with Doris – including, of course, the divine Ms. Cleo Nova, a.k.a. Joe’s wife and production partner, my dear friend Peggy Steffans. The day we met was memorable because it was September 10, 2001, the day before the World Trade Center was attacked. At any rate, I just thought Joe was the most extraordinarily kind and sincere guy - and I fell in love with Peggy right off the bat - so we just sort of became friends. Then I realized that Joe’s career needed to be documented as badly (if not more so) than Doris’s (because it was so much bigger) and began expanding my research and interviews to include information about Joe’s work. So I guess you could say that my installation as Joe’s biographer was kind of an outgrowth of the fact that I liked the guy so much and was always enthused about the prospect of foraging in new fields. Since so many of his films were missing or dispersed or difficult to find at the time I met him, it probably took a couple of years for me to actually get to see the majority of his work.
To my eyes Sarno is one of the key filmmakers of the sixties and seventies. For folks who are just being introduced to his works what film would you recommend as an ideal introduction, and do you have a personal favorite you would like to share with us?
Overall, I’ve always felt that Joe Sarno fans are very self-selected: there’s a certain rhythm to his work that not everybody is able to groove with. My favorites of Joe’s films tend to reflect my own interest in cinematic minimalism, films where Joe simply lets a situation build and is not primarily focused on the mechanics of technique. I usually weed out the Sarnoites from the tourists by suggesting that they watch Vibrations (1968): if that doesn’t strike you as one of the best fucking movies ever made, then you probably aren’t going to get too carried away by the rest of his work. For me, Vibrations is Sarno in crack form... one light, agonizingly tight framing, oodles of repressed desire. Perfect.
Misty poster courtesy of Michael's terrific Sarno Facebook group, Red Roses of Passion.
Among his earlier efforts (and don’t forget that several of his mid-Sixties films are still officially “lost”), I really like The Sex Cycle: it’s so naïve yet so engaging it literally makes me high: it’s like a dream I want to remember forever. And in terms of his later soft-core work, Abigail Lesley and Misty (if you can find a bootleg) are so melancholy and sincere that I feel they ought to be counted among the top 100 films of the 1970s.
Your liner-notes that have graced Sarno’s DVDs are extremely insightful and informative. Do you have plans in the future on perhaps releasing a full-scale biography?
Sometime in the next few years (but please don’t hold me that that!), there will be a major Joe Sarno biography. Joe had an extraordinary career and it has to be accurately documented. I also spent many, many hours interviewing him on audiotape a few years ago, so there are lots of observations he made that I want to get out there.
I know you have had the great fortune to meet and interview many of Sarno’s key collaborators and actors. Is there someone in particular that has proven elusive that you would like to sit down with?
Yes. Her name is Patricia McNair and she starred in many of Joe’s seminal sexploitation classics of the mid-1960s under the name Lorraine or Laurene Claire. She was an extraordinary presence in Joe’s films and someone I have never been able to track down.
Before he passed away you helped Sarno on the extras of his extraordinary Abigail Lesley is Back in Town. I think the film is a masterpiece and the DVD that came out earlier this year became an instant favorite. Along with the incredible commentary and interviews you got to go back to Sarno’s hometown of Amityville with him. Can you talk about this mini-doc a bit as I find it incredibly moving?
Since Joe shot most of Abigail Lesley in and around Amityville, we wanted to go back and find some of the locations he used. We had, in fact, not planned to interview him in the car on the way out there, but I am so grateful that my extraordinary cameraman, Scooter McCrae, thought to start rolling while we talked. Then, of course, we were lucky enough to have had access to the house where Joe grew up since his childhood friend Henry Marcley now lived there – a wonderful guy! So I wish I could say that I had the prescience to plan everything that happened that day, but it just kind of fell together – as it turns out, less than a year before Joe passed away. I’m very glad we got it on tape.
The late Jamie Gillis also was on hand for the film’s extras. What were your impressions of him and did you get the sense that he was happy to have some of his work recognized as important?
Jamie was an extremely sincere, intense, thoughtful guy the few times I met him and he seemed to think the world of Joe as a director. I believe he was very happy to receive recognition for his work as an actor – not just a porn star – during his last few years.
By the late seventies, Sarno was working fairly actively in the adult film industry. How did Sarno feel about his time in that industry and did he have any favorite performers from the era he worked with?
Joe was a director’s director: if he wasn’t making a movie, he didn’t know what to do with himself. So I know he put his heart and soul into making explicit, X-rated films as well. That having been said, he also frequently observed that he felt there were inherent limitations to what one could do with a film with hardcore content, so it wasn’t his favorite way to work. But given the vagaries of the adult film market, he was very grateful to have the chance to stay in production and was proud of every film he made.

In terms of his favorite actors, Joe got along with 99% of his actors famously, so I doubt he privileged one over the other. He was very fond of Tina Russell, Georgie Spelvin (a great lady!), Jennifer Welles, Annie Sprinkle. He and Peggy were very close to Rob Everett (Eric Edwards) and Harry Reems. Joe managed to get the best out of everyone he worked with: the actors trusted him because he was intensely sincere about his work.
One thing I greatly admire about you is your dedication to filmmakers who are so often ignored and sometimes greatly maligned. Have you had a lot of opposition from certain film elitists who don’t see the value in directors you admire and find important?
The “opposition” one encounters to the kind of work I do usually takes the form of silence. And it comes more from academics than from contemporary film critics, most of whom, I have found, have a very soft spot in their hearts for the labors of filmmakers like Joe and Doris. The problem that academic intellectuals have is that most films of this nature do not naturally lend themselves to textualization: in other words, most interesting “outsider” filmmaking lacks a certain self-consciousness, an explicit aesthetic agenda, that most intellectuals look for and try to translate textually into articles, etc. So the silence of the films tends to inspire silence in the scholars – and believe me, if anybody abhors silence, it’s academics! So I guess I see myself as a little bit of a fish out of water in this respect, but it has always been a reflex of mine to respond to naiveté and spontaneity in art. Most intellectuals want art-makers to be intellectuals too. I don’t.
Do you have any future career plans you would like to share with us?
Outside of attempting to complete all of the above (gasp! moan!), I would very much like to bring more attention to great, French “outsider” filmmakers like Jean Rollin and Jose Benazeraf – tremendous talents whose work has not always been valued by their own countrymen. It would be nice to help arrange decent retrospectives of their films in the U.S. And I have a few side projects lingering as well: a book on actor/director Neil Flanagan composed in the vein of Rudolph Grey’s Ed Wood biography, Nightmare of Ecstasy; and a substantial essay on the dubbing industry in New York during the 1960s and ‘70s, a fascinating and important element of the cultural history of foreign film reception in America. I have also been assisting porn auteur Carter Stevens pull together a memoir about his own extraordinary career for quite a while: he’s a wonderful guy and I’m sorry I have not been able to focus on it more exclusively. My biggest problem, obviously, is that I never run out of subjects that interest me! One day it will all get done.
Cult Epics first (of what I hope will be many) Radley Metzger DVDs, a special edition of Score, has recently come out and Michael's fine work can be found on that disc's supplements. I also wanted to mention that Michael has been working tirelessly in the last few years uploading thousands of additions and corrections to the IMDB's listings for the adult films of the sixties and seventies. He has also uploaded hundreds of accurate release dates (you can usually tell his as he includes the city in which the premiere occurred) for these films that he has verified through his exhaustive research.
Thanks again to Michael for agreeing to do this and I hope it will lead some folks here to seek out some of the films mentioned above. Also, please take a moment and join the Red Roses of Passion Facebook page as Michael and I would greatly appreciate it.
Monday, April 10, 2017
Remembering Radley Metzger: The Henry Paris Years
THE PRIVATE AFTERNOONS OF PAMELA MANN (1974)

Easily one of the most important archival releases of the decade, Distribpix's collection dedicated to Radley Metzger's The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is a powerhouse release and essential purchase for Metzger-fans and cinema-lovers. This double-disc edition of Metzger's first outing as the legendary Henry Paris offers up the film completely uncut and beautifully remastered. Armed with an arsenal of valuable extras, this version of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is not only the best edition of this film ever released but one of the best releases of its kind ever.


Frank is a private detective, and self-confessed peeping tom, who is hired on by a Mr. Mann to spy on his wife Pamela, as he suspects she is having an affair. Frank follows and films Pamela as she makes her way through various Manhattan locations and soon finds himself involved in a life much more complicated and surprising than he would have ever imagined.

Despite being shot on an extremely low-budget in less than a week, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann contains the same sort of depth, polish and style as Radley Metzger's more well-known films from the sixties and seventies such Therese and Isabelle, The Lickerish Quartet and Camille 2000. A wonderfully self-aware work powered by a smart script, witty dialogue, terrific performances and Metzger's considerable skill behind the camera, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann takes all the conventions of a typical adult-film and playfully turns them inside out. As Lawrence Cohen notes in his wonderful analysis in Distribix's near fifty page liner-notes, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann is a, "legitimate work of art", and, "one that deserves the loving attention of film connoisseurs." Radley Metzger's first Henry Paris film waves a defiant middle-finger to film fans and historians who insist on ignoring the golden age of adult cinema as a viable art-form, and it is an ideal entryway for newcomers interested in 'The Other Hollywood'.


Film historian Benson Hurst points out in his excellent notes for Distribix's booklet that The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann came about due to a few different factors, with two of the most notable being the financial failure of Metzger's previous film, the excellent Score, and the release of Damiano's Deep Throat in 1972. Hurst notes that, "overnight the landscape for soft-core films changed", and that, "the market for stylish fantasy trips made with intelligence and high production values", like the films Metzger had been making for more than a decade, were gone. Audiences were enjoying the new-found freedom to watch more explicit forms of film-making and, though he was hesitant to join in, Radley Metzger took the plunge with The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann and for five years he delivered the most exquisite and smartest adult films American audiences had seen before or since.


The one aspect about Radley Metzger I have always valued the most is just how much this man loves film. The near fetishistic obsession with celluloid is apparent in all of Metzger's best films and this is especially true of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann. Hurst writes that it just took a few minutes of meeting Metzger before the conversation turned to film and he noted that, "Radley balances an encyclopedic knowledge with a humble and genuine interest in other people's opinions." Radley Metzger, now in his seventies, remains a man fascinated by all things cinematic and this obsession is reflected in many of his most memorable characters, several of which can be found in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann.





It might be a surprise to those who just know his reputation as an erotic auteur, but the two most repeated images in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann don't concern sex. Going along with Radley Metzger's love for cinema, the two things we see the most of throughout the film are a camera and projector. Like in his earlier masterwork The Lickerish Quartet, the characters in The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann spend much of the running time watching and studying film, and we, as an audience, are treated to numerous shots of the camera, the inner-workings of the projector and even the film itself. Metzger's first Paris production is a strikingly post-modern work that is so confident in its self-awareness that it doesn't miss an opportunity to comment on it. Make no mistake though, while it certainly has elements of satire in it, this isn't a parody of an adult-film. It is in actuality an embrace of the genre and what it is capable of. It is also a slap in the face to the conservative groups looking to ban these films and prosecute those involved with the film's most biting moment being a line delivered by Metzger's editor Lola Lagarce, who shows up as a poll-taker throughout the film asking Pamela about heated issues of the day. I won't give away the film's most explosive and funniest moment but I will say that it is perhaps the most jaw-dropping line in all of Metzger's filmography.








It is fitting that such a high quality film as The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann be graced with an extraordinary cast and it certainly is. As the title character striking looking Barbara Bourbon is quite wonderful. Sexy, warm and witty, Bourbon really shines as Pamala Mann and its a shame she only appeared in a handful of films before retiring. Distribpix's booklet features an enlightening new interview with her that will be of great interest to those who ever wondered what happened to one of adult-cinema's greatest disappearing acts. The rest of the cast is made up of some of New York's finest including the uber-talented Eric Edwards and Jamie Gillis (whose sporting a head of hair here that I would kill for) and the iconic Georgina Spelvin, who delivers a very funny and inventive performance as Pamela's friend Linda (her Rhoda to Bourbon's Mary if you will). Also on hand in smaller roles are Sonny Landham, Darby Lloyd Rains, Marc Stevens (excluding a goofy charm), Alan Marlow, Levi Richards and gorgeous Naomi Jason (billed as Day Jason). Naomi, who would appear in the terrific The Passions of Carol in 1976, is a real scene-stealer here as a receptionist dealing with a very particular form of office-harassment.




Shot on 16mm, by furure Oscar winner Paul Glickman (as Marcel Hall), The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann, like so many other of these films made during this period, offers up a wonderful view of New York City in the mid-seventies. With its numerous street-shots, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann acts as much of a valentine to the city as say a Woody Allen film from the period. For folks, like myself, who have fond memories of the city Metzger's film will be a real eye-opening experience as New York is presented so lovingly and so incredibly well.







While the release of the uncut version of The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann would make Distribpix's collection a must-buy the Criterion style treatment the film has received as far as extras go make it truly indispensable. Disc-one offers up a fascinating commentary track from Metzger himself, as well as the original theatrical trailer, a stills gallery and an excellent near 40 minute interview with Eric Edwards. The exhaustive extras continue on disc 2 in the shape of a truly special near 40 minute chat with Georgina Spelvin (such a charmer), a 2011 re-release trailer, outtakes, stills, press-clippings, a then and now look at the locations and a never before seen alternate version of the film prepared for, but not released in, 1976. Add on the impressive almost fifty page booklet and a glossy still of Bourbon and you have one of the most comprehensive and worth-while DVD collections ever released.




More information on The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann can be found at Distribpix's official site, order-site (NSFW) and blog. It is one of the essential collections in recent memory and Distrippix's dedication to a film most would be content to ignore is both noble and noteworthy.
NAKED CAME THE STRANGER (1975)
...

For a brief period in 1969, a Long Island housewife named Penelope Ashe was one of the most popular novelists in America. Her face was everywhere and her first book, Naked Came the Stranger, was a smash and eventually landed on The New York Times bestseller list. While there was nothing strange about a first-time writer having a hit out of the gate, the thing that made Mrs. Penelope Ashe unique was that she was as fictional as the book her name had graced. Penelope Ashe and Naked Came the Stranger were an elaborate, and quite brilliant, literary hoax put-on by a frustrated Newsday columnist named Mike McGrady, and a number of his colleagues, who set out to prove that by 1969 it was trash that was selling and not great literature. To make an odd story even odder, when the truth was revealed about Penelope Ashe, Naked Came the Stranger became an even bigger phenomenon spawning copycat books and even sequels of sorts by McGrady himself, all of which is detailed extraordinarily well by Benson Hurst in his great liner-notes to the special edition of the 1975 film based on the literary prank.




While the novel of Naked Came the Stranger was deliberate trash, the cinematic version written and directed by Radley Metzger (under his Henry Paris guise) was great-art and Distribpix's tremendous special-edition of the film finally grants its proper-placing as one of the defining films of the mid-seventies. Erotic, funny, and very smart, Radley Metzger's Naked Came the Stranger is among his greatest and most provocative works and one of the best adult-films ever made.




Radley Metzger mentions on the terrific audio-commentary for Naked Came the Stranger that by 1975 he felt, in a way, that he could do no wrong and that thought is more than accurate as he had been creatively on fire throughout the early and mid-seventies. Within just five-years Metzger had unleashed a series of erotic masterworks including The Lickerish Quartet (1970), Little Mother (1973), Score (1974), The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann (1974) The Image (1975) and Naked Came the Stranger. This unbelievable winning-streak would crescendo in 1976 with the dazzling The Opening of Misty Beethoven, a work rightly considered as the best adult-film ever made.






While many are content writing a film like Naked Came the Stranger out of film history books, the film is a truly exceptional and special work. Lawrence Cohen writes in his wonderfully crafted analysis of the film, featured in the Distribpix liner notes, that, "if one simply dismisses Naked Came the Stranger as just another hard-core offering from the mid-seventies that is not worthy of critical attention, one utterly fails to do justice to the film's undeniable sophistication and polish." Cohen (who summons up the ghosts of Diogenes, Fitzgerald and Valentino in his notes) later writes, that Naked Came the Stranger is, "vintage Metzger" and I think it is just as good, if not better, than his first superlative effort as Henry Paris, The Private Afternoons as Pamela Mann.






While The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann seemed obsessed with the idea of vision, then it is sound (and during one sequence the lack of) that is at the forefront of Naked Came the Stranger. From the talk radio-show that stars Darby Lloyd Rains and Levi Richards host in the film, to the incredibly humorous and sexy sequence featuring Darby listening at the door as Levi has a romantic encounter with Mary Stuart, to the astonishing silent-film section, Naked Came the Stranger is a film pushed by the importance of sound in cinema and the way that characters listen (but often don't hear) one another. Like all of Metzger's great works, it is a film fueled by his enduring love for cinema and the fact that it embraces old Hollywood in the midst of a cultural revolution that all but ended the classic-period makes it a quite profound and moving work. With Naked Came the Stranger, Metzger is indeed paying a sweet-farewell to the old while totally embracing the new.



Like all of his other Henry Paris productions, Metzger was blessed with an extraordinary cast for Naked Came the Stranger. As the frustrated housewife Gilly, who attempts to get her philandering husband's attention by having her own string of affairs, Darby Lloyd Rains is an absolute revelation and her work here is quite astonishing, as she mixes humor, grace and sexiness to absolutely devastating effect. Hurst's notes on Rains fascinating, and often frustrating, career are particularly poignant and he writes that today, "Darby lives quietly" and "remembers Radley well." Extremely handsome Levi Richards is on hand as Gilly's husband Billy and the charming Mary Stuart makes a big-splash as Billy's assistant and mistress Phyllis. Keep a look out for a hilarious cameo by iconic Marc Stevens during a party-sequence as well.



Hurst, Cohen and Ian Culmell do such an exhaustive job discussing the film in Distribpix's notes that it feels a bit awkward to go over much of it here. A few facts are worth repeating though. Metzger shot the film, just before Christmas in 1974, less than six months after The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann had its premiere. Once again Metzger would use New York as an additional character for the film and the many shots of the city remain some of the most arresting and captivating ever captured on film. Upon release Naked Came the Stranger would be a hit with both mainstream and adult critics as well as audiences, who flocked to the film. A particularly telling portion of the disc's 'ephemera gallery' is a vintage article stating that Naked Came the Stranger was the highest grossing film in New York for a stretch in 1975, ahead of such films as Monty Python and the Holy Grail, The Day of the Locust and The French Connection 2! It's a jarring reminder as to just how disturbingly conservative film goers and theater-owners have become since the artistic golden-age of the seventies.


While Naked Came the Stranger is a wonderful film throughout its running-time it is at its most extraordinary and daring when Metzger brilliantly recreate a classic black and white silent-film at the Hotel St. George. The scene is visually jaw-dropping, beautifully-shot and stands as one of the great tour-de-force moments of Metzger's career. Watching it, in the lovely transfer from Distribpix, I teared up several times due to the fact that you would hard-pressed to find such ingenuity, passion and skill in too many American films after the seventies.

Like their exemplary releases of Metzger's The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann and Maraschino Cherry, Naked Came the Strange has been beautifully restored from the original negative and comes armed with a slew of valuable extra-features. These include the aforementioned booklet and audio-commentary as well as deleted and alternate scenes, a look at the film's locations (then and now), trailers, radio-spots and a film-facts subtitle track. It's another beautiful and lovingly put-together package from Distribpix that again solidifies their place as some of the best film-archivists on the planet.

THE OPENING OF MISTY BEETHOVEN (1976)
What a magnificent run it had been. Between 1966 and 1976, New York born filmmaker Radley Metzger had delivered a series of stunning films that showed him as one of the bravest, most innovative and most vital directors on the planet. Whether his camera was capturing the streets of New York or a European countryside, Radley Metzger proved himself as one of American Cinema’s true greats, even though his deserved place in the Golden cinematic canon has still not been granted by many film historians who have continued to either ignore his landmark work or degrade it.
While an argument can be made as to whether The Opening of Misty Beethoven is Radley Metzger’s greatest film, it is hard to deny that this 1976 masterpiece isn't his most representative. With The Opening of Misty Beethoven, Metzger managed to capture and combine the sensual decadence of his European lensed work of the late sixties with the witty hard eroticism of his New York based pictures of the seventies. The Opening of Misty Beethoven is the ultimate Radley Metzger film and one of the most important, and finest, English-language films of the seventies.
While The Opening of Misty Beethoven is rightly often granted the title of the greatest adult film ever made it is also one of the warmest and wittiest. Metzger’s modern update of George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion has the exhilarating flair of a classic Lubitsch film and the cinematic bravado of a vintage Hawks. Metzger’s razor-sharp script is packed with the kind of memorable dialogue that would have made any of the great classic American screenwriters he so admires blush with envy. The globe-trotting The Opening of Misty Beethoven (Metzger took the production to Paris, Rome and New York) is also stylistically one of the most thrilling films of the period and Metzger’s compositional strengths teamed with Oscar winner Paul Glickman’s photography will be eye opening to even the most jaded film buff.
The Opening of Misty Beethoven was unleashed on DVD and Blu-Ray collection by Distribpix that rivals anything Criterion has ever mounted. Treating the film as the great work of art, and bold cinematic achievement, that it is the folks at Distribpix (led by the great Steven Morowitz) have released the best archival disc of the decade and the most important, as no other film offers up the much needed rewrite of accepted film history like The Opening of Misty Beethoven. Distribpix’s collection offers up a sparkling and lovingly restored new remaster of Metzger’s uncut opus with hours upon hours of supplemental features including documentaries, interviews, vintage materials, outtakes, deleted scenes, audio-commentaries and, best of all, the long-rumored ‘alternate’ cut of Misty. Lawrence Cohen writes in his beautiful liner notes, in the massive fifty-plus page book that accompanies the DVD, that watching The Opening of Misty Beethoven will make film lovers rub, “ones eyes in disbelief that a such a creation actually exists” and that pretty much sums up the feeling I get when I hold the package Distribpix produced for us.
Metzger admits in the enlightening audio-commentary that accompanies The Opening of Misty Beethoven that after the success of his first two “Henry Paris” productions The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann and Naked Came the Stranger that he felt like he could do anything he wanted with his newest venture and that confidence is on display throughout the film. The Opening of Misty Beethoven is the work of a master with the knowledge that he was at his peak of his powers as an artist and a filmmaker. Film historian Benson Hurst writes in Distribpix’s booklet that The Opening of Misty Beethoven, “premiered in 1976 boasting a script, cinematography, music and acting of a caliber never seen before or since in the (adult) industry”. This was Radley Metzger’s Magnum-Opus and I think, perhaps, the great director realized that very fact when he was making the film in the mid-seventies.
While all of Metzger’s films are wonderful examples of true ‘director-driven’ works they all benefit greatly from Radley’s uncanny eye for casting. The Opening of Misty Beethoven is populated by perhaps the greatest cast he ever assembled from the star making supporting turns of Gloria Leonard to Jacqueline Beudant to Ras Kean to Mary Stewart to Jenny Baxter to Terri Hall (seriously swoon) to the jaw dropping legendary lead performances by Jamie Gillis and Constance Money…every scene is just filled with some of the most beautiful, charismatic and talented performers of the period and to say they all serve the intelligence, and timing, of Metzger’s script incredibly well would be a gross understatement.
The spirit of the late Jamie Gillis haunts every frame of The Opening of Misty Beethoven. His award-winning turn as Dr. Seymore Love is one of the great, great creations of the seventies and stands with any ‘mainstream’ performance from 1976 you care to mention. Gillis’ delightful work in the film is given a further heart wrenching dimension after one reads Hurst’s lovely notes about how much the film meant to the great man, which is summed up so wonderfully succiently with, “Happy times. Happy Place.” Hurst’s later recollection of helping put touch Jamie in touch again with his greatest leading lady Constance Money shortly before his death due to cancer in 2010 is unbelievably moving and I doubt any lover of the film, and this period, will get through this story without shedding at least a few tears.
And what of the elusive and mysterious Susan Jensen a.k.a. Constance Money, the alluring and intoxicating disappearing-act who brought Misty Beethoven to glorious life more than thirty-five years ago? While Distribix couldn't convince her to appear in the supplements that are on their Misty Beethoven collection, they did track her down and the documentary (and notes) on her are eye opening (I especially love when Metzger helps warmly set the record straight about her in the commentary) and the fact that she is penning a memoir is amazing news. While she appeared in a few films after The Opening of Misty Beethoven, Money remains frozen in time due to her iconic work as Metzger’s most memorable heroine. There is no need to say the film wouldn't have worked without Constance Money…she‘s like a collective cinematic dream as Misty Beethoven and every moment she had in front of Metzger’s camera is, for the lack of a better word, magical.
Fueled by a tremendous ad-campaign, a grand-opening night and an audacious soundtrack (compiled by the great music director George Craig), The Opening of Misty Beethoven opened in 1976 and damn near became the crossover smash Metzger had hoped for and deserved but, at the end of the day, America (and mainstream cinema) was (and is) just too uptight to truly accept the film and it remains one of the great ‘hidden’ movies in film history, although Distribpix’s jaw-dropping collection has already started opening some eyes and changing some minds. Time rewards great works and the time for The Opening of Misty Beethoven is NOW and Radley Metzger’s acceptance into the established cinematic canon is long OVERDUE.
Benson Hurst writes that The Opening of Misty Beethoven left Radley Metzger absolutely exhausted and that, “the grueling months in the editing room (really) took their toll". While he managed to direct a few more films, including the final two Henry Paris films Barbara Broadcast and Maraschino Cherry, Metzger would never again be able to make a film quite as powerful and visionary as The Opening of Misty Beethoven. With the film, he had reached the top of the mountain, took a moment to survey his great creation and then took the inevitable journey back down.
Distribpix went to heroic lengths in restoring The Opening of Misty Beethoven and getting it, not only on a DVD set, but also Blu-ray. While all of the extras they assembled are indeed godsends finally getting to see the alternate cut of the film (which includes a number of takes and even scenes not in the original) is particularly breathtaking. The collection is exhaustive, lovingly assembled and it makes previous releases of the film seem absolutely quaint (although the VCA disc is worth holding onto for a commentary track with Gloria Leonard and Jamie Gillis that isn't included on the Distribpix release). The DVD and Blu-ray set isn't the only prize available for fans of the the film as there is finally now a soundtrack (which features an astounding forty page booklet detailing Ian Culmell’s astonishing archival dedication and digging), t-shirts, posters and more. The lucky patrons who were able to give larger amounts to the ambitious drive to get the film on Blu-Ray were even treated to additional discs of outtakes (which I oh so hope to get to see someday). The whole package (and the passion that went into making it) is quite awe-inspiring.
Recently Sight and Sound conducted their once every decade poll regarding the Greatest Films ever made and the results were as dull and stagnate as ever. The history of film is being turned into a tenured aging professor, at another gala honoring his past works, ignoring the students who carried on his great ideas long after he has stopped caring. Ignore the canon, seek out the cinematic fringe dwellers and create your own greatest films list...in the words of the great Hyman Mandel, "never let the fact that they are doing it wrong stop you from doing it right."
BARBARA BROADCAST (1977)

There was no real way to follow up a work quite as towering as The Opening of Misty Beethoven. Metzger's 1976 masterpiece closed out a stunning ten year period that few of even the greatest filmmakers could even dream of matching. Metzger's final few years behind the camera would yield more great work but he would never top The Opening of Misty Beethoven and to Metzger's credit he knew better than to try. Ironically, despite the fact that it doesn't stand among his greatest works, Barbara Broadcast is perhaps the most influential film Metzger ever shot especially in the realm of adult cinema as its almost gonzo like episodic nature and emphasis on stars rather than story remains the most copied hard core trope in history. With Barbara Broadcast, Metzger took a huge creative step backwards while virtually inventing the modern hardcore film.

Barbara Broadcast is controlled by its extraordinary cast. While bits of Metzger's trademark humor are on display, and his expertise behind the camera never falters, Barbara Broadcast is essentially a showcase for Annette Haven, Susan McBain, Jamie Gillis, Wade Nichols, Constance Money and especially C.J. Laing. It's the work of a master but an exhausted master and it feels more like an vibrant postscript more than a completely realized great work.

The famous tagline of Barbara Broadcast is "An Erotic Film in Four Courses" and that sums it up very nicely. Gone is the audacious ambition of Metzger's masterworks that led up to it. Barbara Broadcast is a deliberately bare-bones work that manages to be among the most erotic films Metzger ever made while being among the least transcendent. Benson Hurst notes in excellent liner notes to Distribpix's incredible Blu-ray release of Barbara Broadcast that in many ways the film was, "a reaction against" the "particularly lengthy, arduous and complicated" production that had been The Opening of Misty Beethoven. There is a sense of fatigue that controls Metzger's direction of Barbara Broadcast that isn't found anywhere else in his filmography but his perfect cast makes up for it, especially in the film's most legendary sequence featuring the smoldering pairing of Nichols and Laing, which Distribpix restored to its uncut presentation after years of being censored on past video releases. As Hurst correctly notes, Barbara Broadcast's most acclaimed scene is the "ne plus ultra of adult cinema" and the "apotheosis of C.J. Laing."

Barbara Broadcast closes with a scene that was cut from The Opening of Misty Beethoven that would damage the professional relationship between Metzger and Constance Money. It's easy to see why the bondage themed segment between Jamie Gillis and Money was cut from Misty and it's a pity that its inclusion in Barbara Broadcast would lead to litigation between Metzger and Money, who hadn't approved its appearance. Regardless of the behind the scenes drama, the scene is brutally hypnotic and undeniably memorable.

Distribpix's Barbara Broadcast special edition is dazzling and exhaustive. Powered by a beautiful restoration of the film and another wonderful commentary by Metzger, the Blu-ray DVD combo is loaded with extras including a documentary and the rarely seen 'soft' version of the film. Like Distribpix's other Henry Paris titles, it's an absolutely essential release of a flawed but extremely important film.
While it is perhaps his weakest work as Henry Paris, 1978’s Maraschino Cherry is one of the most important, as it the swansong for Metzger’s alter-ego.
Starring a dazzling cast made up of the best New York based actresses of the seventies, including Gloria Leonard, Leslie Bovee, Annette Haven, C.J. Laing, Jenny Baxter, Susan McBain and Constance Money, Maraschino Cherry is an extremely stylish spectacle that sends Henry Paris out in style.
Made up of new footage interspersed with some unused older scenes (including the ones with Money), Maraschino Cherry is, along with Barbara Broadcast (1977), the most episodic film Metzger created under the Paris pseudonym, but what it lacks in narrative consistency is made up for by the go for broke attitude of Radley and his extremely talented cast. Maraschino Cherry is a seriously cool film that run hot in its rather slim running time of 84 minutes, and it remains one of the most memorable films of the late seventies.
A visually dynamic production, thanks to Metzger’s always dazzling cinematic eye, Maraschino Cherry also benefits greatly from sharp editing (credited to a Harvey Katz but probably done by Metzger himself) that keeps the production flowing quickly and smoothly. Metzger’s directorial flourishes and great camera work is also apparent in every shot of the film as his great eye for composition, even though Maraschino Cherry finally plays out as one of the least defined great films of Radley’s career.
What will really put Seventies film enthusiasts in absolute heaven with Maraschino Cherry is its extraordinary cast. The always reliable Gloria Leonard was never better, or sexier, as the title character and she generates so much intelligence and wit for Metzger here. Scene-stealing Leslie Bouvee is particularly lovely here and drop-dead gorgeous Annette Haven is especially memorable in the film’s final section. The exquisite Constance Money also brings her oh so distinctive brand of beauty and Jenny Baxter is a real charmer as Maraschino’s sister Jenny, but the film ultimately belongs to the fearless C.J. Laing, who really blows the roof off the place in the show-stopping ‘dungeon’ set finale. Laing, as she did in Barbara Broadcast, proves herself to be one of the most searing and sexiest performers film world has ever seen and it is impossible to take your eyes off her when she appears.
Radley Metzger would all but retire from the film world after the release of Maraschino Cherry, as he only had a few relatively minor works on his resume after its release. His final true Henry Paris production is marked by the same innovation, skill and style of all his great works and it is an absolute must see for Metzger enthusiasts and seventies film fanatics in general.
Thankfully Maraschino Cherry was also granted a full-blown special edition release thanks to DistribPix’s Platinum Elite Edition. This beautiful double disc collection, which comes with a booklet (with tremendous liner notes by Benson Hurst, which can be read at Distribpix's blog) and film negative, contains a very nicely remastered version from the uncut 35 mm negative as well several really nice extras, including a fascinating 30 minute recent interview with Leonard, bonus scenes, rare photos and trailers. Like their other collectors editions, the team at Distribpix put a lot of love into the release of Maraschino Cherry and it gives this important film a great home.
All of Distribpix's special Henry Paris editions come with the highest possible recommendation. For those looking to get the films on a budget minus all of the extraordinary bells and whistles, a box-set featuring just the films is also available and each film can now be bought separately as well.
Radley Metzger's period working as Henry Paris remains one of the most important, if undervalued, moments in film history. A jaw-dropping meeting between the European Art House, Hardcore filmmaking and the American Independent spirit, there are simply no other films like The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann, Naked Came The Stranger, The Opening of Misty Beethoven, Barbara Broadcast and Maraschino Cherry. They aren't just great films, they are great art and no serious study of film history is complete without them.
JEREMY RICHEY, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Moon in the Gutter (Month By Month)
-
►
2014
(26)
- Dec 2014 (2)
- Nov 2014 (1)
- Oct 2014 (3)
- Sep 2014 (1)
- Aug 2014 (1)
- Jun 2014 (1)
- May 2014 (3)
- Apr 2014 (1)
- Mar 2014 (5)
- Feb 2014 (3)
- Jan 2014 (5)
-
►
2013
(72)
- Dec 2013 (4)
- Nov 2013 (4)
- Oct 2013 (2)
- Sep 2013 (4)
- Aug 2013 (3)
- Jul 2013 (1)
- Jun 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (19)
- Apr 2013 (9)
- Mar 2013 (5)
- Feb 2013 (7)
- Jan 2013 (10)
-
►
2012
(120)
- Dec 2012 (25)
- Nov 2012 (3)
- Oct 2012 (10)
- Sep 2012 (4)
- Aug 2012 (4)
- Jul 2012 (3)
- Jun 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (7)
- Apr 2012 (14)
- Mar 2012 (11)
- Feb 2012 (11)
- Jan 2012 (21)
-
►
2011
(16)
- Dec 2011 (7)
- Nov 2011 (2)
- Oct 2011 (1)
- Jul 2011 (2)
- Apr 2011 (2)
- Mar 2011 (1)
- Jan 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(22)
- Dec 2010 (1)
- Oct 2010 (1)
- Sep 2010 (2)
- Jul 2010 (3)
- Jun 2010 (1)
- Apr 2010 (9)
- Mar 2010 (5)
BLOG CREATED, EDITED and WRITTEN BY JEREMY RICHEY: Began in DEC 2006. The written content of all posts (excepting quotes from reviews, books, other publications) COPYRIGHT JEREMY RICHEY.



























































