THE MOON IN THE GUTTER ARCHIVES

I AM CURRENTLY WORKING ON EXPANDING AND REVISING SOME OF THE BEST PIECES FROM MOON IN THE GUTTER AT MY OFFICIAL SITE, NOSTALGIA KINKY. THIS NEW PROJECT CAN BE ACCESSED BY CLICKING THE PICTURE BELOW.

THE MOON IN THE GUTTER ARCHIVES

Recent Posts from my Official Site

Showing posts with label Al Pacino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Pacino. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

When Bad Art Happens To Great Films


Has anyone else been noticing just how truly horrendous a lot of the artwork from the big studios is getting for their home market? The tendency to not use the original, and almost always superior, theatrical posters has been going on for awhile but some of the latest photoshoppe nightmares (such as this one for the upcoming And Justice For All disc are truly disturbing.
Everything about a lot of these new discs just shows a total lack of respect to the artists and the films. Of course, this has always been a problem on the home video market but I have never seen quite so many sloppy and ill conceived cover designs as I am now. It just baffles me how so studios with millions upon millions of dollars on hand for promotion can't be bothered to care a little bit more for the looks of their products, when small companies like Severin and Blue Underground with limited funds at best can keep continually coming up with some of the most beautiful packaging on the market.
I suppose it all does come down to really caring about the films, which is something many of the large studios seem to have none for (especially their older catalogue films)...but for God's sake couldn't they have at least made Al Pacino's head look like it belongs on his body?
Oh well, I suppose the trend will continue, and apparently I am not the only one disturbed by it as a Google search for 'bad DVD artwork' brought over 200,000 hits. The new And Justice For All disc will be out in a couple of months and I will buy it for the new bonus features...but I won't be displaying this ill conceived artwork anywhere in easy view.

Two I'm Looking Forward To


With everyone abuzz about long awaited upcoming archival releases from the likes of Resnais, Godard, Bergman, Antonioni and so on I thought I would offer up a couple of other discs coming this year that I am excited about.
First up we have Hugh Hudson's Revolution, his disastrous 1985 bomb which did no favors for its stars Al Pacino, Nastassja Kinski and Donald Sutherland. I've been reading about Pacino and Hudson's desire to revisit the film for years, so I am very intrigued by late May's release of Revolution: Revisited. Outside of being a new cut of the much maligned film, the disc also includes a conversation with Pacino and Hudson.
If the original theatrical version of Revolution deserved all the heat it took, then it can be said that John Boorman's beautiful Beyond Rangoon (1995) didn't deserve to be as ignored as much as it was. Boorman's terrific and moving film starring the always fascinating Patricia Arquette (an actress I should celebrate more here) has been a favorite of mine since I first saw it in its brief theatrical run nearly fifteen years ago. I'm glad that I will finally be able to pitch my old laserdisc dub of the film, and I am greatly anticipating this disc, which sadly only features a featurette as an extra.

Behind the Scenes With My Favorite Actors: Al Pacino in Serpico

"What's this for? For bein' an honest cop? Or for being stupid enough to get shot in the face? You tell them that they can shove it."












Taschen's The Godfather Family Album Coming in an Affordable Edition


Taschen's stunning The Godfather Family Album, featuring hundreds of beautiful rare photographs by Steve Schapiro from all 3 films, is now coming soon in an affordable edition for fans to enjoy. The book was previously only available as a very limited signed edition that cost over a $1000.00 so the new version is quite a steal at $69.99 (or $44.09 discounted at Amazon). I can't wait to get my copy and I wanted to give a heads up to readers here as well.

Sunday, June 28, 2026

A Slight Rant On One Of The Biggest Snubs In Academy Award History


I've been thinking a lot about Michael Mann's The Insider lately. Part of it has to do with this excellent new blog I have discovered called Radiator Heaven, which is run by a really intelligent writer that everyone should check out. Another reason it keeps crossing my mind is that I have been thinking a lot about the state of modern American films and why my tastes seem to be falling further and further away from what other people value.
Truth be told, I don't think there are too many American films from the past decade that can hold a candle to The Insider. Whereas any number of directors (and I won't name any names here but you know who they are) might set out to make an 'important' film, I feel Mann actually achieved that with this film. I also don't think there has been a better acted film in the past ten years with Russell Crowe's performance as Jeffrey Wigand being among the best I have ever seen.

This all got me to thinking about the film's performance at the 1999 Academy Awards when it was shut out after being nominated for seven awards. I couldn't remember what was big that year so I looked it up and discovered with distaste that it was none other than American Beauty, a popular film I don't like that kind of sums up the division I feel with a lot of other modern film fans.
I didn't think American Beauty was a terrible film but I didn't think it was a good one either and even mentioning it in the same breath with something like The Insider baffles me. Nearly ten years later I don't understand why the public or critics responded to Mendes' film so strongly.
The best actor award that year went to Kevin Spacey, an actor I typically like but not in American Beauty and frankly comparing Spacey's rather limp turn to Crowe's monumental performance is unbelievably jarring to me. I think it was to a lot of folks as well as it was just a year later that Crowe did indeed win the award he should have taken home in 99 for Gladiator, a great film and performance but to my eyes not at the level of The Insider.
Michael Mann lost the directing prize to Sam Mendes, again for American Beauty and he also lost the best adapted screenplay award to John Irving for The Cider House Rules (you couldn't make this stuff up if you tried, it's like the academy voters all smoked cracked before submitting their ballots). Also on the losing end that night was the film's cinematographer Dante Spinotti and the editing and sound teams.
Pacino, who gives one of the best performances of his life here, wasn't even granted a nomination nor was Lisa Gerrard, whose breathtaking score is one of the most effective I have ever heard.
Add on insult to injury, the film's current DVD is one of the most botched I have ever seen with an non-existent audio commentary by Crowe and Pacino listed on the back and only a short featurette granted as an extra. In a world where we have special editions of Police Academy and Mallrats, can't we get a decent dvd release of The Insider?
There have been lots of other wince inducing years at the Oscars (don't even get me started on 1952, 1968, or pretty much the entire decade of the eighties) but the 1999 awards really bug me. Which all goes towards saying if you have never seen The Insider, or if it has been awhile, give it a look. I hope that a decent DVD hits stores eventually, as it is the current one can be found typically for under ten dollars at stores and online.

The Most Incompetent Film Of The Year (or how Revolution got off the hook in less than two hours)


Regular readers here at Moon In The Gutter probably realize a couple of things. One is that I rarely write on films that I really hate…I mean I’m not getting paid for this so why waste my time? Two is that Al Pacino is my favorite American actor, which is the reason I am going to briefly break my first rule here for this post.
Jon Avnet might not be the worst director working in Hollywood today but, if judging 88 Minutes is any signal, he might be close. 88 Minutes is easily the worst film Al Pacino has ever appeared in…it makes the likes of Author Author (1982) and Revolution (1985) seem downright inspired. Avnet’s film is also the worst film I have seen this year, and I hope to God I don’t have to sit through anything quite as bad again for quite awhile.
The most regrettable thing about 88 Minutes is just how great of a cast it has. Joining Pacino is everyone from Amy Brennaman to William Forsythe to Deborah Karr Unger to Leelee Sobieski…all fine actors who no doubt signed on for the chance to work with Pacino.
The unbearably bad script is credited to Gary Scott Thompson so all the blame can’t be placed at Avnet’s feet, but most of it can as 88 Minutes looks like it was directed by a blindfolded man who has never touched a camera before. The idea that it is also Avnet who directed the upcoming Pacino and DeNiro film, Righteous Kill, makes me heartbreakingly leery of what should be a historic collaboration.
I’m glad that I don’t have to refer to Revolution as Al Pacino’s worst film anymore but trudging through the dismal 88 Minutes was still one of the most depressing and dispiriting experiences I have had in quite a while. Thank God Pacino is currently filming a picture with the interesting Gattaca and Lord of War creator Andrew Niccol as the great man deserves much better than the likes of Jon Avnet and 88 Minutes.

Schatzberg's Scarecrow: Seven Stories, Seven Shots

Part of my Scarecrow tribute week at Harry Moseby Confidential.
Scarecrow 1
Bronx born director Jerry Schatzberg came to fame in the sixties as a photographer whose work graced the pages of Vogue, Esquire and many other of the period’s most respected and famed publications. He also found time to photograph some of the decade’s greatest album covers including the legendary Blonde on Blonde sleeve for Bob Dylan.
In the late sixties he began dating up and coming Hollywood legend Faye Dunaway and it would indeed be the Bonnie and Clyde star who would be the leading lady of Schatzberg’s first film, 1970’s Puzzle of a Downfall Child. The film would generate quite a bit of controversy and received a vastly mixed critical reaction when it was released, although many agreed that Schatzberg was a talent to watch.
Schatzberg would follow up Puzzle of a Downfall Child with the acclaimed junkie drama Panic in Needle Park, a film which starred a young actor named Al Pacino. The harrowing film would lead to Scarecrow, a picture that would see the director and the future Oscar winning actor collaborating for the second and final time.
Schatzberg has never received the credit he has deserved as being one of the key American directors of the early seventies. Scarecrow remains arguably the greatest achievement of an often overlooked career behind the camera.
Scarecrow 2
Schatzberg’s film would mark the first screen credit for award winning and revered playwright Garry Michael White. Pacino would call White’s original script as the best he had ever read and Scarecrow does indeed stand as one of the most challenging and moving scripts of the seventies, a poignant work that would work as an entirely personal project while securing itself as an insightful look at an America that was becoming more and more distrustful of authority. Is there a more knowing and chilling acknowledgement of what was happening to America in the midst of Vietnam and Watergate than when Hackman’s Max says towards the end of the film, “Who Can I trust now”?
Scarecrow 3
Gene Hackman has called Scarecrow the favorite of all of the films he worked on in his career, impressive considering the number of classics that have appeared among the 100 or so titles he has starred in. Hackman had just won the Oscar for William Friedkin’s searing The French Connection when he shot Scarecrow, and his performance as Max for Schatzberg is the equal of his work as the famed Popeye Doyle that had won him so much acclaim. Incredibly neither Hackman nor Pacino were nominated for Oscars for Scarecrow.
Scarecrow 4
The film would become a sensation in Europe when it was initially released in 1973 and it won the coveted Golden Palm at that year’s Cannes Festival. Schatzberg and his film would also win several other top European prizes, a fact that makes the initial relative failure of the film in America all the more surprising. The film would open to poor box office and mixed reviews in the Spring of 1973 causing a disillusioned Hackman to announce he would only work on commercial projects afterwards, a promise thankfully he didn’t keep. It would take years for the film to really find its audience in America, even though it is still not held perhaps in the esteem that it should be.
Scarecrow 5
There was some reported tension between Hackman and Pacino on the set as the two had vastly different ways of approaching the material. The two would have the up most respect for each other though and have spoken highly of the experience since. Hackman would recall on Larry King that he loved and admired Pacino, a factor that went into him naming Scarecrow as his favorite film. Scarecrow marks the only time these two giants would work together.
Scarecrow 6
Behind the scenes players included legendary cinematographer Vilmos Zsigmond, and his work combined with Scatzbergs marks Scarecrow as a photography lover’s dream and one of the most striking looking features of the seventies. The film’s intriguing editing which melds some surprising jump cuts into Schatzberg’s celebrated long takes is courtesy of none other than Evan A. Lottman, the man who would cut The Exorcist in the same year as Scarecrow. The film’s off kilter but effective score is credited to Fred Myrow, an interesting composer who would later provide the very effective music for the influential shocker Phantasm in 1979.
Scarecrow 7
Scarecrow came out just a month before I was born in 1973. I first saw it when I was around 15 courtesy of a censored TV print and I immediately fell in love with it. I consider it one of the key American films of the seventies and more than a dozen viewings of it over the years have only increased my admiration and love for the film.

Sidney Lumet: My Personal Top-Ten



When I heard the sad news yesterday morning that Sidney Lumet had passed away I spent much of the day reflecting on his films and how much they had meant to me. I remembered being a teenager in the eighties and discovering Lumet classics on TV and VHS like 12 Angry Men, The Fugitive Kind, Equus, Network and The Verdict. I specifically remember my first life-altering viewings of Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon, two films that shaped me in a way that just a handful have.
The sheer volume of great films, and television works, in Lumet’s filmography is quite staggering. He’s one of the few American filmmakers I can think of that managed to deliver truly great works in a whopping six different decades and he never lost his power, a fact which can be seen in his great final film Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead. While many of the films in Lumet’s canon are rightfully considered classics, there are quite a few really splendid works that are in need of rediscovery and reevaluation such as The Appointment, Prince of the City, Daniel, Power, Running on Empty and Night Falls on Manhattan.
Lumet was a truly great American filmmaker who directed some of the best films in all of modern cinema, and helped guide many of our finest actors to some of their greatest performances. He was an innovator and a risk-taker and even his misfires remain compelling works of art. Here is a list of the ten films from Sidney Lumet that meant the most to me. Please feel free to share your own choices in the comments section.



1. Serpico (1973)



2. Dog Day Afternoon (1975)



3. Network (1976)



4. Running on Empty (1988)



5. The Verdict (1982)




6. The Appointment (1969)



7. Prince of the City (1981)



8. Equus (1977)



9. Power (1986)



10. 12 Angry Men (1957)

Harry Moseby Confidential Hits The Road

Scarecrow
Starts Monday at Harry Moseby Confidential.

Friday, August 31, 2018

"The Crows are Laughin." Visiting Two SCARECROW Filming Locations




Last month I spent my final day, of one of the saddest years of my life, in a city I had grown to despise visiting two shooting locations of one of my favorite films...Jerry Schatzberg's magnificent 1973 work Scarecrow.  I had been meaning to visit these two spots since I had arrived in Denver nearly two years ago but this particular morning, still reeling from the news that my marriage of eight years was unexpectedly ending, seemed fitting.  "Guess what I'm a scarecrow" but the crows hadn't been laughing at me in Colorado only attacking...

What was once the Turk's Supper Club at 539 West 43rd is still standing...abandoned but I felt the ghosts of Hackman and Pacino as young men everywhere around me as I photographed the building.
     





















The house where Max and Lion briefly stayed, at the second location at 4256 Elati Street, was long ago demolished.  In its place sits a depressing and ugly industrial storage unit...reminding me only of Trump's terrifying and bullshit once United States.  After snapping a few photographs I hopped in my car and left behind the life and future I thought I had forever.
I hope to never return to Denver again.
 









-Jeremy Richey, 2018-

Moon in the Gutter (Month By Month)

BLOG CREATED, EDITED and WRITTEN BY JEREMY RICHEY: Began in DEC 2006. The written content of all posts (excepting quotes from reviews, books, other publications) COPYRIGHT JEREMY RICHEY.